Breaking News: plagiarist Einstein replaced by Preacher Doc (Part 4)

Per argument based on "Logic" and FACTS, this semi-retired World Class scientist & inventor, suggests, that plagiarist Einstein be replaced as "#1 Man of 20th Century". (Better late than never!) Note: Professor Umberto Bartocci, PROVES that Olinto DePretto put forth E = mc^2, two years before Einstein, per his book, "Albert Einstein and Olinto DePretto, the true history of the world's most famous equation. (E = mc^2). ------- Another top proving fact is: David Hilbert, a top Mathematician, put forth the Field Equations for "The General Theory of Relativity" BEFORE Einstein; then Einstein (after two years of trying) published 'his' (!?) Field Equations; that are a duplication of what David Hilbert presented. ----- Begin my "One-On-One" Showdown conferences with Einstein! ----------
Perhaps THE "Breaking News" is publicly discussing my "Maphics" (Mafics), combining the philosophy of Mathematics with the philosophy of Physics into ONE philosophy, "Maphics" (Mafics, European languages).

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Einstein
• plagiarist
• plagiarism
• Relativity
• space
• time
• math. physics
• math.-physics
• Lorentz
• Poincare`
• Phillip Lenard
• news
• smart
• Truman
• Nov. 2
• 1948
• pyramid of power
• immorality
• J. Edgar Hoover
• president
• reviews
• politics
• David Hilbert
• Doc Castellano
• PROOF
• Maphics
• Mafics

[Rand0mManic]

Forgive me if I fail to link to the variables and constants, It has been a year since I dicussed these developments and I am lucky to find one who I can commit to talking about these ideas. I can formulate it as well, when I lubricate my physics lingo and with some guidence from an old buff like yourself I believe we could construct something functional..

The log of the LFO is not too crucial at present, you understand why the ball on the waves all ways travels to shore. wave>><Air resistance

[PreacherDoc1]

@Rand0mManic , ----- I think I understand. ----- Yours Truly, relegated Science, secondary, 40 +/- years ago! 'Forgot' about such a nationalistic, plagiaristic, hyped -up, racket. I literally force myself, due to priorities & time, to participate. (Obvious, since 2 months since checked to see if any comment.) ----- Doubt, re-enter the Science Field. May only be able, based on recognizing someone's work, etc.; to respond to comments concerning what I have posted.

[Rand0mManic]

This shows great relationship of the action that energy has upon the floating object, the raltionship of energy and mass and more possibe the effect that mass has upon enregy.

The wave crashes on the beach and washes back under the waves recycling the mass the energy has delivered to the shore. When the mass is returned back to the sea, the water level must raise and lower at the waves frequency.

[PreacherDoc1]

@Rand0mManic , interesting!

[Rand0mManic]

I came up with LFO being the mechanism of gravity. by watching the waves on the sea.

Wave always travel towards the land. Being an old surfer I used to use wave energy to get me to the shore and the mass (undertow) to get me out out to the break.

A simple experiment I show my children was to throw a ball out into the water at the beach, and sure as, every time the "log" wave from would bring it back to shore. One is LFO energy>mass (LFO wave>water) and the other is capacited mass (undertow).

[PreacherDoc1]

@Rand0mManic , interesting. I hope to have the time, etc. to keep tract of your theory.

[PreacherDoc1]

@Rand0mManic , thank you for participating. ----- I have the opinion that "Space" (for all practical purposes) is a void (devoid of any natural substance). Space is the distance, d, in Galileo's; v = d / t. ---- If you think your theory is correct; keep working with it; and presenting it.

[jcliveron]

this is aspeech I've been looking for a long time before

[PreacherDoc1]

Your factual, blunt expose` of plagiarist Einstein is another of the ever growing authors who are: "Telling it like it is!"  Regarding Einstein's plagiarism, I will continue to read &/or view your presentations. ----- If you publicize any of my presentations, regarding; "Einstein, the worlds greatest --- plagiarist!"; I will be grateful. -----------

[Rand0mManic]

When discovering Science when taught of nuetrons this never made any real sense to me. It just seemed like they threw in a particle to make the eqausion add up,

Nuetrons different to beta particles and different to protons? Give me a few days to myself fill in the holes. But I have always believed in a nucleus and the orbiter and the missing link is R and space maybe particles. The value of space particles can change in larger atoms the relaltionship of R multple protons/ electron valences.

[Rand0mManic]

One out there idea came to mind, is that the H atom just at fusion point casts its electron or its ehrm "nuetron" R inclusive of the new model, and then the electron with loss of postive for valence emits (a) space particle/s. Ejection of energy must prevail in fusion,

Maybe here is where my space particle theory falls apart and more explains sub atomic formation. However what ever comes from the electron side or Ehm nuetron in fusion energy exchange must be explored.

[Rand0mManic]

R= entropy of E is more as to why miscalculations of light year and dimentional space is being seen IMO, R not within E=mc^2 IMO is one very linear equation. possible explains the small variation of natural atomic isotope imbalances. <space particle represent R.

Maybe E/R+R=MC^2 although very rough is closer to the equation applied to field theory as an inversion of matter theory. Like .000000001 or what-ever yeilds much difference in atomic fission. But they were animals in the physics world.