Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Marc Stevens & Ben Lowrey - Court Cases, IRS Tax & Parking Tickets - (www.marcstevens.net)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,939
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 10, 2011

http://www.benlowrey.com creditors in commerce winston shrout jack smith gordon hall brandon adams robert menard accepted for value A4v john harris commercial redemption free man on the land ben lowrey bashar john demartini zeitgeist fractional reserve money debt fiat alex jones prison planet info wars project camelot TPUC Tim Turner Sam Davis Douglas Riddle Vince Kahn cveitch charlie veitch divine natural positive canon veronica chapman sovereign republic self determination dean clifford

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (benlowreyhimself)

  • You can only gain the kinda knowledge Marc has from actually spending time in a courtroom, no amount of internet research or reading can get you that knowledge. I know no-one likes to go to court but believe me, It aint as scary a place as people imagine, I know cos I spent enough time in the places, in my younger (less sensible ha) days. I was a regular in the dock & had some good results, Not Guilty's & Acquittals, against them using their own procedure & Marcs theories make a lot of sense

  • @ConCaine1

    yes. thank you

  • keep these coming. you're the man

  • @widowerson

    thank you

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @StephenOwensTV Then ask him who has "offered" him?And dont consent to the offer.Then ask him if he has any financial interests associated with the plaintiff and if said interests would be a conflict of interest?Who's your employer?Whos the prosecutors and witnesses employer?Sounds like a racketeering ring to me not a court of "Just-Us"

  • great interview, I absolutely like marc's approach

  • amazing ben thanks for this vid was very helpful

  • Glad to see you finally come around Ben. Cheers!

  • @texme All well and good Mark saying that BUT, and it's a big BUT. Just like Ben has said in earlier video, "Section B Reckless information" because statement 3 is left hanging like the Ace card (smug expression) But what if the Judge replies.

    "I do not represent anyone. I am an impartial adjudicator. Offered to you and the plaintiff as a way to resolve a dispute." Which is in fact the case and more likely to be the reply, rather than "oh well case dismissed"

    Now What?

  • Why not just ask the judge if consent makes the law? Then don't consent, thank everyone for playing and go home.

    

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more