Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

13H Refutes CCHR: IOD (Chapter 8) Psychiatric Drugs (1/2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,437
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 30, 2008

This video pertains to sections 8 which discusses psychiatric drugs... I'm rushing through 9.. so there'll be more later.
scientology cchr psychiatry anonymous industry death debunk review cult xenu hubbard mental mealth depression ADHD dianetics reality history abuse american founding father Skinner Box Urban Legend behavioral science hitler nazi eugenics darwin galton museum conspiracy theory evolution cos propoganda psyche deception fraud warped racism politics drugs ECT Labotomy Shock Therapy depression Siberia USA ward commitment involuntary manipulation DSM prove chemical imbalance proof tom cruise

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (92)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Electro shock treatment is still used now - in fact its use is increasing. So ones choice is between brain surgery or chemical brain damage. You think it is an improvement? How do you come to this conclusion?

  • @Mrscientificmethod "toostonedtocare".. Who's that? Not an ID I remember, however upon checking, they're not blocked.. care to try again?

  • and...

    So those 'showing an unhealthy obsession.'? What do you mean? Define. Unlike yourself who have spent much time making so many many videos.. you ban those who make a few dissenting comments..... i.e toostonedtocare??

    You would make the perfect psychiatrist.

    Of course you do not remember those you have banned. . . . you will only remember those that think you are wonderful. Wanker.

  • @13Heathens To quote your own comment...'The few I've blocked are in the minority and fall in one of three categories; Trolls, zealous and unwilling to listen (conspiracy nuts), or showing an unhealthy obsession.'

    So ' in the minority' means what? Science panders to the majority? Do not think so.

    So.. 'zealous and unwilling to listen' Or maybe the very knowlegable and concerned.. who are not willing to accept your voice of vacuous authority?

  • @Mrscientificmethod "I can give you at least 2 names that I have had contact with"

    Go ahead.

  • @Mrscientificmethod Perhaps you can tell me about what is wrong with all the children in the US that are forced to take poisonous drugs. Drugs similar to those that if I chose to take them I would face imprisonment!!! How logical is that? (Don't get me 'wrong'! I, like Szasz, believe that no government has the authority to dictate what I chose to put into my body.) Anyway. rant over for now. ;-)

  • @Mrscientificmethod The reason why those that think differently from normal experience such stress is because of this notion that there is something 'wrong' with them. That they are not 'right in the head' And of course psychiatry is the arm of the state, as Foucalt pointed out, that attempts to imprison and 'cure' those that think differently. You sir, are a disgrace.

  • @13Heathens 'he is ultimately promoting (through his lectures) the notion that there's nothing wrong with schizophrenics etc'. Yes he is saying there is nothing 'wrong'. You, however, think that they are wrong. Despite years of abuse by psychiatry gay people have claimed that there is nothing 'wrong' with them. MadPride is an organisation that states also... there is nothing 'wrong' with us despite the spurious claims of society and people like yourself.

  • @13Heathens 'no chemical imbalance'? Can you show the science behind the chemical imbalance theory then? There is not one.. not one piece of evidence for this. It is a 'belief'. Psychiatry is a belief system akin to creationism and astrology. Yet the one documentary.. yes the one and only... that attempts to show this (despite it's many flaws).. you choose to attack with venom.

  • @13Heathens 'those little Szasz followers are the one's I'm after' Come on then. Make a valid criticism. You do not have the intellect to understand what he is saying and continually build straw dog arguments. 'People who have mental difficulties are further stigmatized'. Szasz states that those defining those with a mental 'disease' are just being stigmatized. You also demonstrate this stigma. Yet you refer to his view as an 'avalanche of fanatical bullshit.' You are illogical.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more