September Clues - Part 3

Part 3 :
" OF MISSILES AND MEN "

You may download SEPTEMBER CLUES in high-resolution here :
http://www.septemberclues.info/

http://911Revolution.magnify.net

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• wtc
• loosechange
• amazing
• animation
• crazy
• drama
• explosion
• extreme
• fire
• bush
• hollywood
• commercial
• 911Revolution

[hankwheels]

To the media outlets: DON'T BE COWARDS, AIR 'SEPTEMBER CLUES' AND LET THE PUBLIC DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES. I DARE YOU. The government used it's control over the mainstream media such as ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, and NBC to air faked plane footage so the citizens would support the military's plans for wars in the Middle East (over oil production).

[hankwheels]

I am a huge fan of the September Clues videos. However, one important piece of evidence I don't think they ever mention is that:

United Airlines planes are mostly BLUE, but in the close-up footage of Flight 175, particularily CNN's, the plane is COMPLETLEY gray! How could the public be so STUPID to believe it was a real United Airlines plane??

[edyken77]

@PiufeliceinCortona You are dead on. It's one of the most damning betrayal of physics in this hole shebang. Wings folding in is one thing, but what about the 44ft tall tail fin? Did that fold in(down?) as well? A joke! All the 'explanations' and 'witnesses' completely leave this out. The computer model also left out the goddamn engines! The strongest 2 components of the plane aside from the black box and no evidence of them!

[edyken77]

@NWOisAwesome can you explain the perspective of the towers being exactly identical in two different angles? Look at the roof line and antenna of WTC1 in both shots, they are exactly the same. Septemberclues' 'matrix' theory looks to be true.

[edyken77]

@thewelly1973 I agree that the ball is just a result of low quality video. Your comment on them removing the backdrop to see the plane clearer, can you cite a source for that? If that is really what they did then that is highly questionable behavior for a news outlet. Also, I am wondering if they altered the angle of the plane as well because the two clips show an entirely different approach angle, while the perspective of the towers remain EXACTLY identical.

[thewelly1973]

@thewelly1973 they took the backdrop out so you can see the plane clearer. too many witnesses ssaw a plane crash. too many families grieving for it to be a hoax. The ball is just shit film footage of the plane, I do beleive however than the us airforce shot down the 93 plane. I was watching this on sky news as it happened and saw the 2nd plane go in live on air

[11September2001]

@thewelly1973 .... ;-) ...it`s a big theater you are in too, don`t believe what you have heard...check it yourself!! ...and please...answer, if YOU can.

[thewelly1973]

so if there were no planes, who were the passengers. Yeh you could make them up, but could you make up all the families who look devastated by there loss. Answer please

[watershed44]

Bottom line 9/11 and the War on Americans (Terror) are PSY OPs perpetrated upon the people by a group of elite cabalists called the illuminati . They will have their NWO no matter how many innocents are murdered or crushed.

[NWOisAwesome]

The "edited" video ... you guys are blind. It's TWO DIFFERENT ANGLES. No on edited out a background. No one added a plane. They are two nearly identical but completely different videos.

[PiufeliceinCortona]

he's an idiot and the fact that the "wings folded" hitting the Pentagon is absolutely and very obviously a lie. if the wings didn't "fold" hitting the twin towers, two solid steel structures, are you fing kidding me?! what a bunch of bull

[grav04330]

@ChristianHolloway7 as a clever distraction to get tons of people arguing over whether it was a commercial plane or not instead of questioning whether or not the planes were really there.