Typical Evolution Argument....

if i had given particular examples of the science claims in my video that would have limited the point i was making to the example i give...i guess i was thinking ahead...this video was not about any argument in particular but a general observation of the debate skills of evolutionists...however here are some typical examples...

"misuse of authority", when evo's say 99% of scientists agree with evolution, the scientists could agree with some claims, but not all the claims made by evolution science, so the poll could be deceptive, in the fact that the scientists were not polled about every claim evolution makes...that's misuse of authority, it's also evidence by vote, which is not valid, there are many comments here using that fallacy.

"hasty generalization" is to say that anyone who doesn't agree with evolution don't understand the science.

."begging the question" to say evolution must be true because why would a God create disease.

."argument to future" to say we are finding new evidence of evolution all the time.

"appeal to people" to say everyone knows that or believes that..

."hypothesis contrary to fact" to tell people we evolved from apes, when evolution science says humans only share a common ancestor to apes

"chronological snobbery" to say something happens so long ago making it impossible to verify.

and people spout these fallacies over and over...there are just some examples, there are many.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• evolution fallacies
• .evolution destroyed

[Helixbuilder]

1) What theory is proven? Kindly state when a theory can be proven.show references.

2) In science authority goes to the data, observations, and facts not personalities.

3) Provide examples of what you are talking about don't just say it's so. Stat the argument then show why you think it is not correct.

[metalsusa1]

@aaugoaa Alright, fair enough. But considering the creationist/evolution debates going on on You Tube you will be hard pressed not to encounter it. Your video is very reminiscent of creationist arguments and understanding of the theory.

I will respect your wishes though. Good day.

[aaugoaa]

@metalsusa1 to be honest i spent at least 2 years debating evolution science i never met one person who could keep on topic about evolution science without bringing religion or atheism into the reasoning. even you have done it in your first comment. i got bored with it, and found it pointless. i no longer debate evolution science. i deleted most of my videos on the subject about a year ago, and have never looked back. so i will decline your offer of a discussion on the topic. :0)

[metalsusa1]

@aaugoaa I will not stay down. I'll keep it respectful and on point, bring it. Let's see how much you really understand about evolution.

[metalsusa1]

@aaugoaa You threaten to block anyone who uses words like religious or atheism to describe this video but the terminology you use for example "Darwinists" is taken right out of the creationist hand book. There's a tone in your "voice" in this video that is very familiar. You seem to deny evolution, dating methods, and borrow from Kirk Cameron ( a well known creationist in America) when demonstrating what evolution should produce. Why should anyone take you seriously?

[swisscheesepotatochi]

@buffboynick yeah, like 99.9% of the scientists are total rednecks...

[evoTARDSareINSANE]

evolution = time based "faith" system

Its a CULT, the cult of the non-existent ape-man

[Christistruth1]

Notice the atheists trolls, giving the thumbs down?

[buffboynick]

evolutionists lack critical thinking skills, basic logic, and the ability to separate reality from erroneous speculation

The outdated theory has now become a cult.