Reason Two for putting Ron Paul in the White House

Please note that the use of profanity in comments to this video will result in those comments being removed and may result in the blocking of users making the profane comments.

This video is titled "Reason Two for putting Ron Paul in the White House." Like my previous video, "Reason One," we can see here flagrant abuses of constitutional rights by people who have sworn to defend them.

I said in the last video that we are perilously close to a total police state, run by a corporate fascist elite. With this in mind, it is perhaps worth a moment to explain what Fascism is. The definition in Webster's dictionary includes these elements: Fascism stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader and using forcible suppression of opposition.

You may not be aware of this but in May of 2007, without fanfare, President Bush signed Homeland Security Presidential Directive 51 (HSPD 51 for short). That directive gives the President total government control at all levels in the event of an emergency. He can suspend congress, he can put the supreme court into recess, he can seize state, county, city and tribal governments by Presidential fiat, and he can even suspend elections.

This directive gives the President total control over the media, the power to commandeer all transportation, including your family car, and to stop interstate travel, as well as other powers. In short, HSPD51 gives just about all the power that a dictator would want when seizing control of a country.

Granted, the President may only do this in time of emergency. But this directive leaves the definition and declaration of emergencies in the hands of the President. I recommend you read HSPD51 and then get ahold of your congressman immediately.

Meantime, this clip shows what we can look forward to if somebody disagrees with the establishment. It is important for you to know that the being man arrested in this video did nothing more provocative than to ask John Kerry if he was a member of Skull and Bones. Granted, he was confrontational. But since when has that been illegal?

Be prepared. This is not easy to watch.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron
• paul
• president
• candidate
• 2008
• constitution
• violation
• rights
• mccain
• obama
• clinton
• huckabee
• civil
• liberty

[DalevisLives]

Anyone who would defend the actions of the officers, regardless of what the student did, has already began to succumb to the mind-numbing tactics of the Globalists, which want us to accept Government Corruption as the norm, and just "give in" to it...

[dlondon1144]

Amen.

[dlondon1144]

I invited 4951WEDDEL to post a video response and drop the matter and he ignored me, choosing to continue his tirade. Despite his allegation to the contrary, 20 of the 45 posts on this thread (not including this one) are 4951WEDDEL's. They are all saying essentially the same thing. That says SPAM to me. 4951WEDDEL has been blocked.

[dlondon1144]

Attention all and sundry - I don't want to stifle your enthuisiasm for commenting on this video but if make the same point over and over and over, I am going to get tired of you and then phhtt! You're gone.

[gsuitter]

HSPD 51, over my dead body.

[wp4565775]

Yahoo for Ron Paul!

[mdeleplank]

Wow I can't believe they're allowed to do this in the United States of America.

[ctrackmonger]

all it takes is a few people to stand up and say that is brutality. The people will come around when they realize others have morals and will stand together.

[ctrackmonger]

If I was there there would be me getting tazed when I am slapping the shit out of one of those cops.

[thomasmoonman]

im going to jail with this guy if he is my friend, on the floor being tazed for asking a legitimate question, those cops would have a 5 on2 situation real fast.....for sure.

[verbvideo]

What was the guy behind the two officers motioning right before they grabbed him? As if he was saying, stop the question and remove this guy. Anyone else see this?

[jkasten89]

What law? The police never asked him to leave (unless it was off microphone) and who was he supposed to yield the microphone to? Maybe it was off camera, but I can't distinguish anybody. Given the information I can get from the video, I can't determine that anything illegal was being done. If I'm missing something, please tell me specifically what it is.

[dlondon1144]

Very good point aboutupholding existing laws, Gooby. There is, actually, constitutional injunction against arresting a person first and then making up a law to try him with (no ex post facto laws).