Rachmaninov Etude-Tableaux, Op. 39, No. 2
Loading...
12,168
Loading...
Uploader Comments (justinsanner)
Top Comments
-
What a lovely interpretation of this song! The accompanying footage was a great idea, it really provokes a feeling of serenity!
-
Nice Interpretation!!
Beautiful sound
see all
All Comments (27)
-
My most favourite one!
-
not in my programs. Just working on op.33 . But Perhaps I will do it soon. (I read a little sarcasm in your response. Hope not so. sorry for my english again)
-
That's a beautiful Étude.
-
i dont like the sound.
-
I like the Boosey and Hawkes edition on the right!!! That's what I have! Just started working on this tonight for my junior recital in April. Will also be playing #3 and #5 (my favorite) from the same opus. Nice playing!!!
-
nice^^
Loading...
Why (the F..k, @#ç§!!) such a good pianist doesn't play the 2plets as written? instead of playing with "swing" right on the 3plets??
bachopinberg 2 years ago
I was using various degrees of rubato to emulate the ebb and flow of the sea. In a piece such as this, the triplets (for example) should not sound like one is playing with a metronome. This is one of those areas where a pianist can put in their own artistry. And the use of rubato is one of the things which makes one pianist's interpretation different than that of another pianist.
justinsanner 2 years ago
It's no matter of "artistry" here, but of syntax. 2plets on 3plets sounds in a specific way, and no other, and artistry comes to bend this proper effect just before the point this effect becomes "ANOTHER THING". (sorry for my english, and, please play 2 on 3 correctly, no matter of metronome, metronome is out of topic here)
bachopinberg 2 years ago
I have an idea. Why don't you give me a link to your video of this piece so I can hear and see what you're talking about specifically. I'll put your video under Video Responses so people can review it.
justinsanner 2 years ago