A Scientific Debate on Race and Intelligence - Part 3 of 11
Top Comments
All Comments (85)
-
he says there are no races. but it does not stop blacks from demanding special privileges for blacks...is that a construct too???
-
Nurture Dictates Nature.
-
Fuck u nation matters
-
Well socio-political construct based on biological construct so it's biological construct again. So why is media and holywood and almost all this shit biologically oriented then ?
-
@thespacialone If my tone sounds harsh it's because you came to my channel initially to mock the scholars challenging the assertions of Rushton. You insulted them, you called me a lunatic and you accuse me of some politically correct bias when I have presented this debate fairly and let people come to their own conclusions. You are not open-minded enough to try to understand the arguments being put fourth before you attack them. You put your ideology before your reasoning.
-
@thespacialone In other words Africans are lacking in the general intelligence that matters to modern society but may excel at specific types of intelligence that only Africans are uniquely good at. So basically Africans are idiot savants in your view. Yeah nice theory, too bad it's based on nothing. Graves argument is that explanations for why and how populations allegedly came to have such marked differences in intellect are not based on valid scientific reasoning.
-
@EgalitarianJay In final clarification my position is thus: Africans excel in many forms of intelligence, many of which are not well understood. I will concede that shortfalls in certain types of intelligence have lead to an underselling of and derision toward other intelligence traits peculiar to Africans. Africans' natural affinity for language bears testament to the fact they think and learn in very different ways from Asians and Europeans, who I believe share greater commonality.
Whatever.
-
@thespacialone I recommend you leave then because all you are doing is rambling. You don't not understand the scientific arguments being put fourth and have an emotional need to believe in a racist myth i.e. "Africans are stupid". That's what this race and IQ obsession is really all about. I uploaded this video for educational purposes for people who are genuinely interested in the arguments not for people like you making immature, emotional rants.
-
@EgalitarianJay 3/3 ...is, and how and why it operates in the way it does - same for Chinese, Russians, whatever (yes, I realize Africa is a big place and Africans are no more uniform than Europeans, i.e. extremely diverse). When did we forget this?
Imo, it is your intellectually fascistic "egalitarianism" that destroys any chance people have of understanding who they really are, how they can progress.
I'm done. This is just too moronic.
-
@EgalitarianJay 2/3 ...in IQ test performance, he's casting doubt on the evolutionary explanations, NOT on the myriad data, which stands in contradistinction to every absurdity you utter. Intelligence, as ALL traits, differs among individuals AND groups because NATURE DOES NOT DO "EQUAL".
The fact is that people are MASSIVELY different. African intelligence is suited to Africans living as Africans in Africa. Only Africans can understand what it is to be African, what African intelligence...
@NappyHeadedHoe90210 One of the trademarks of pseudoscience is the contradiction of itself even with in its own terms. Based on your logic race appears to be synonymous with any form of genetic variation you want it to be. The American Anthropological Association calls this the population model. We can call any population a race so long as it has an identifiable genetic structure therefore race systems are subjective and exist along a continuum. This is inconsistent with the words etymology.
EgalitarianJay 11 months ago 13
@NappyHeadedHoe90210 Edward's accusation of a fallacy on Lewontin's part is false. Lewontin was vindicated by Witherspoon (2007).
EgalitarianJay 11 months ago 10