Abiogenesis wrong

Watch how easy it is to debunk abiogenesis by debunking Stanley Millers experiment. See examples of how science, though evolution, witholds infomation. Correction!!! Please read. The voltage on lightning strikes range from 100,million to 1 billion volts. Not 100,000 volts. There were a lot more recent sites that supported the higher voltage, only older more outdated sites supported the lower voltage. But it makes more sense because it did not sound like 100 thousand voltage could produce temps equal to the surface of the sun. But 100 million to 1 billion sounds more feasible to do that. And all the more makes the point that any animo acids formed in the atmosphere would be also fried by the same voltage that creates it.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Abiogenesis
• stanley
• miller
• Dawkins
• Hawkins
• diversity
• life
• big
• bang
• gravity
• theory
• evolution
• matter
• macro
• micro
• creation
• yec
• oec
• math
• darwin
• lyell
• haeckel
• dawkins
• primordial
• soup
• earth
• millions
• years
• moon
• planet
• star
• solar
• system
• sun
• wind
• lightning
• single
• cell
• chimp
• ape
• monkey

[MsBionomics]

1. High concentrations of amino acids have been found in natural environments such as deep see springs (white smokers). No lightning was incvolved in producing them.

2. "Toxic" is entirely relative to the species concerned and what it adapted too. Live has been found in the most tocic environments.

3. Water and water-vapour and rain existed before free oxygen existed (hillarious mistake).

4. A few centimeters of water will block almost all harmfull UV radiation.

[ikester7579]

@MsBionomics 1) Yet no life has ever been observed coming from amino acids.

2) Life that dies from toxic environment does not produce offspring so therefore does not pass on it;s traits. Nice try.

3) LOL, wrong but nice try. Let's see you prove that or are your word golden and make new realities and truths and break the laws of physics. Show us proof.

4) Under an atmosphere that is protected by ozone, Tell us how many centimeters blocks UV rays under an atmosphere with no ozone?

[1m0n4b04t]

abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution and there is more than just the soup theory to abiogenesis. If you can debunk all of them then maybe just maybe ill consider an all mighty creator.

[ikester7579]

@1m0n4b04t Abiogenesis has to happen before life can even supposedly evolve. And as far as debunks go, evolutionists are the ones who determine whether evolution can be debunked, right? Sounds bias to me. And the maybe just maybe you will believe remark. Let's be honest, you maybe will believe if I debunk them "all", means you are bias because there would be nothing left for you to believe if I did that,

[ikester7579]

@KittJT2 Cannot even be original. Have to copy stuff like Dawkins does so it cannot be directly pointed back to you.All you guys are, are evolution puppets and Darwin is the puppet master.

[KittJT2]

@ikester7579 Er, what 'position' am I defending? Also, what does abiogenesis have to do with an atheists?

P.S. If we're going to compare insults, mine was is a quote from a popular demotivational poster (sub dumb for stupid).

Yours is a cheezy play that's been in circulation for 30 years.

However I am now sure which one it is.

[Rep0007]

Creationists did not evolve like the rest of us. They arose spontaneously from malt liquor and bacon grease in trailer parks.

[ikester7579]

@KittJT2 I find it ironic that when an atheist cannot defend his position he has to resort to personal attacks. So you going to respond with science, or more name calling? You were not even good at the name calling. Need to take a course in scientific name calling 101 so you can protect your theory better.

[KittJT2]

Not sure if trolling... or just dumb.

[PlatinumParade]

nice one, you see the fact of the matter is many of these sheep invest a lot of time and money into their academics than common sense. If what they have invested years worth if time and money proves to be incorrect it means the rug being pulled out from under your feet. That is personally hurtful however by denying the obvious truth you are just fooling yourseleves. Majority opinion is not always right. Evolution theory is as much 'unevolved' as charles darwin himself. Wake up & smell the coffee