2009 Cadillac CTS-V by Hennessey: 11.85 @ 121.79 mph
Top Comments
All Comments (32)
-
@08turboSS The LS9 was also based off of the LS3 block, and the LSA is based off the LS9 with downgraded boost PSI and pulley etc.
-
I am less than a second behind this with My Astro van AWD soon to be quicker wen the Ls3 is done
-
GM LSA: 556 HP and 551 Trq in Stock Tune, differences between LSA and LS9..Hyperutectic Pistons instead of forgings, powdered metal rods instead of titanium, Smaller blower @ 1.9L and 1.5 PSI less boost....Source....December 2009 Chevy Hi Performance.
-
Move...
-
lol, before you start harping on people about "auto or stick," you should get your facts straight. This car has the LSA which is based on the LS9, not LS3.
Regardless, this is a bad 1/4 time if it's modded much at all; it should be running 12.0 stock. But it is an auto and every 1/10 sec counts.
-
the timing doesn't start until the user trips a beam about 6 inches from where he stages. The time between the green light and when the timer starts is what is covered in reaction time. So, even though his reaction time sucks, it doesnt affect the 1/4 mile ET.
-
does anyone else see a problem with this run? this guy started so late after he got the green.. the question is did the time start with the green or with the move?
-
Hey DinoMartini, the CTS-v does not, I repeat, DOES NOT have the LS9 in it IT's a LS3 cousin, wet sump, iron head, much more reliable engine, stronger engine then the LS9 in the ZR1..
When they move. You could sit there for hours if you want. That is why reaction time doesn't matter for a test like this. Only if you are racing the guy next to you or bracket racing would that matter.
ElJefe14221 2 years ago 4
I get so tired of noobs..
The time doesnt start until he breaks the beam. Reaction time means NOTHING on a run like this.
booker357mag 3 years ago 4