(6/6) Science of Sport - Cricket
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (18)
-
@anohsh Blackey don't take too kindly to whitey
-
You must not have watched all the parts as the section on batting talks about Sunil Gavaskar and he was class and Indian!!!!!
-
There's not even 1 Indian in this documentary...LMAO....Cricket without Indians is like batsmen without bats...:(
-
See, this is why Ponting makes for a miserable Australian skip. If the fans can tell he's feeling dejected and frustrated any time the Aussie's have flopped their game plan, imagine how the team feels! Skips should be a help to recovery, not a hindrance.
-
Alex Tudor made no sense in anything he said in the documentary. "It doesn't matter whether you are bowling in front of 100 or 45"? He meant 45,000, I suppose, but either he got his words wrong, or said completely meaningless stuff all throughout the film.
-
BAS VAMPIRE bats are best
-
he was trying to intimidate him, he wasn't trying to hurt him or anything, just keep him on edge.
-
Funny to hear them talking about 'mental toughness' and showing a young Strauss and Swann. Likewise talking about 'possible future England captain.
-
@anohsh he returned the ball to the keeper....but done in a way that it was quite threatning to the batsman....if the batman was out of his crease, then sometimes the bowler will notice this and throw at the stumps (or at lest to pretend too) to show that he is "alert" to whats going on. Just using psycology to unerve the batsman
good one ..
shivapowerprasad 3 years ago 6
when the black man threw the ball at him why did he do that?
anohsh 2 years ago 5