You are indeed correct its 24 frames per second. It was made to look like film. To an extent, I think this is better than a DVX-100. (Im prepared to be flamed for saying this)
this looks very similar to the "24p" look of the Panasonic DVX-100...very filmic/cinematic-looking...am i correct? or does it have that ugly "home video look" ?
I have a Nikon D90 but as yet have not shot any video with it.
Is this a good camera for video work or would you say the Canon 550D is the way to go???
dantastic15 1 year ago
u can record the sound separately if u dont like the sound from D90, (just idea)
mouimen 3 years ago
yep more professionals out of work again...just great..
TonyBeazley 3 years ago
Amazing
alancheah888 3 years ago
What about the sound quality? You think those three little holes look good do you? You like HD quality video with cell phone quality sound? Mmm
mikongo 3 years ago
this is the start of a new era on the world of shooting.
from now on the amateur movie making is in a new dimesion.there is no more amateur shot.
the 24 fps is for everyone.its like having a panavision system. all the cameras on the market have no chance.
24 FPS!!!!!!!! 24FPS!!!!!!
using a 50 mm f1:4 1:8 tele,wideangle now there is no obstacle.
sony dsc f 828 was a little like manually controlled camcorder.manual focus,manual zoom these are the things that a pro camcorder provides you
nmw2853 3 years ago
Yes Joey
You will be flamed and even eated.But not by me because I will probably be flamed with you cause I think like you.
But it would help if the video had the quality switch.
and we need to know if its better than hvx-200 not dvx100
telemart 3 years ago
You are indeed correct its 24 frames per second. It was made to look like film. To an extent, I think this is better than a DVX-100. (Im prepared to be flamed for saying this)
JoeyRythem 3 years ago
this looks very similar to the "24p" look of the Panasonic DVX-100...very filmic/cinematic-looking...am i correct? or does it have that ugly "home video look" ?
bigkingsha 3 years ago