Ken Miller talks about the bacterial flagellum
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Kurpalac's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Kurpalac's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Kurpalac's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Feb 25, 2007
Ken Miller discusses the error of the 'poster child' of intelligent design. He discusses the evolutionary history of the bacterial flagellum and how the parts both in groups and alone have function in other processes than the flagellum which is directly contradicts the idea of 'irreducible complexity.'
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
7:46
Top 7 craziest creationistsby Evolution is just a theoryFeatured
61,177
-
1:57:17
Ken Miller on Intelligent Designby TehBeeble
887,618 views
-
3:25
Ken Miller talks about how to respond to pseudo-scienceby Kurpalac
48,693 views
-
1:58:42
The Collapse of Intelligent Design - Kenneth R. Miller Lectureby davemark07
1,943 views
-
3:51
Ken Miller talks about the evolution of blood clottingby Kurpalac
9,383 views
-
1:08:09
The Great Debate, Part I: Miller & Pennock vs. Dembski & Beheby NatCen4ScienceEd
28,272 views
-
Kenneth R. Miller
372 videos15
-
4:24
Ken Miller on Whale Evolution and Intelligent Designby Kurpalac
47,063 views
-
100
videos
Play all
Ken Miller, Eugenie Scott, and distinguished othersby m8khercum
-
1:25:34
What are the Limits of Darwinism? A Presentation by Dr. Michael Behe at the University of Torontoby P2CStudents's channel
4,435 views
-
3:56
Ken Miller on Cob County Warning Stickersby Kurpalac
10,584 views
-
1:01:12
The Creation Conversation (Stephen Meyer & Michael Behe) (1 of 2)by ChristianityTriumphs
2,347 views
-
4:37
Kenneth R Miller on Richard Dawkinsby IntronFilm
14,843 views
-
2:39
Difference between Science and Intelligent Design(Creation)by Kurpalac
15,851 views
-
10:00
God, Darwin, and Design 1 - Ken Millerby DonExodus2
29,616 views
-
1:32:40
"From Evolutionist to Creationist" by Walter J. Veithby BeyondPatmos
9,989 views
-
51:57
How Did Life Begin? (Michael Behe)by IDquest
3,607 views
-
9:35
Irreducible Complexity? The Bacterial Flagellumby ric h
41,981 views
-
0:53
Ken Miller's Embarrassingly Bad Argument Against IDby IDquest
35,755 views
-
4:58
Intelligent Design is Stupid: Neil deGrasse Tysonby ricoatheist
663,852 views
-
4:22
Ken Miller on Human Evolutionby Kurpalac
204,414 views
-
1:01:47
Michael Behe & Daniel Kuebler - Science and Faith Conferenceby FranciscanUSteubie
3,105 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
foxlake02 2 years ago
A friend gave me "Expelled" to watch. I thought it may have some scientific evidence but not a single speck of evidence was presented. Only whining scientists who lost their job or didn't get a promotion because they were dishonest or not very good at their job. Stein twisted and distorted it to look as though they got persecuted. Very disappointing movie. No more gobbledygook from me. Do your own homework.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
TheRealDetoNato 2 years ago
@theot58
"DARWINIAN/MACRO EVOLUTION IS A FAIRYTALE FOR GROWNUPS.
IT HAS NOT BEEN OBSERVED, MEASURED OR REPEATED - IT IS SIMPLY BELIEVED."
It has been observed and it is not a believe. Stop talking about pseudo science and stop talking about the creation dream. If the creation would be true science would already proved that. But in fact evolution is the only possible and proved explonation and I guess you know nothing about macro and micro evolution. Please read an article on Wikipedia first.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (839)
mahmoud abdeljawwad 7 months ago
the channel still have a desine .
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mahmoud abdeljawwad 7 months ago
the evolution is a responding from the organism for changes in the environment, so what change in the environment can make a channel turn into a motor for moving > this mean in one time the prebacteria had decided not to exchange ions >but only to move it does not make since>
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mahmoud abdeljawwad 7 months ago
still designed>
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mahmoud abdeljawwad 7 months ago
You say like the motor of car can be created if we put its components in a vibrating space for many long time > and if some components match each other they will ever make the car move > their will not be a car u the cleaver.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mahmoud abdeljawwad 7 months ago
the other gob of the preflugellum means that this type of bacteria was not able to move > it can't live without moving it's from it's nature > moreover the bacteria has it's communication gates and channels already with the exterior > if the evolution is right it must give a moving proprieties for a preflagellum>
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
alexander51525 9 months ago
An outrageous fairytale for adults. Miller is trying very hard to protect his job as an evolutionist. Evolution and natural selection cannot create anything. But God sure can. God designed the heart that pumps blood in Miller's chest. He should be grateful for that!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Llamapuncher 9 months ago
What should take blame for? What did I claim? I wouldn't disagree with your assessment otherwise.  If, as you suggested, know very little about much at all, then assuming/asserting anything -like creationist ID- is an argument from ignorance.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
weseyedwalk 9 months ago
Sure, blame the goal post, blame everyone else, but yourself. Just recently, the God particle has been discovered by the largest particle collider in the world in Europe, it has taken us all in a new direction. We now know there are alternate universes from which energy is coming from including the source of gravity, and space appears to be not empty like be formerly believed. We know very little about much at all. Anyone claiming otherwise is a fool.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube