Ken Miller discusses the error of the 'poster child' of intelligent design. He discusses the evolutionary history of the bacterial flagellum and how the parts both in groups and alone have functio...
Ken Miller discusses the error of the 'poster child' of intelligent design. He discusses the evolutionary history of the bacterial flagellum and how the parts both in groups and alone have function in other processes than the flagellum which is directly contradicts the idea of 'irreducible complexity.'
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
@FloydsterUtube , Go read our history, start with the old testiment, The book of enouch, The writings of the anchent summerians, It makes evoulution and creation blend bueatifuly, We are uplifted by beins called gods.
yea you can remove your arm and use it as a stand for your wheelless car, but doesnt mean your arm was made for a stand for your car, im sorry but this argument is really stupid
I don't think you understand how evolution works. The flagella was first used for other purposes, then slowly changed slightly making it useful in other ways. It kept changing slightly over time to be what it is now.
The point is that the ID notion of irreducible complexity (that without every single part it is useless) is 100% wrong, and the flagella has use even in its intermediate stages.
You gotta love Procommenter and his ignorance. First he says that there is no way that the meager mind of man can understand the impetus of life, and then in the next post goes on to say that he knows that evolution could not have happened. Just sheer dishonest religious protecting.
Theory is not at all a synonym of supposition or conjecture or guess. Read a science textbook. A theory, as it is used in Science, is plausible general principle or body of principles offered to explain a phenomenon. Theories make predictions that can be tested. Newton's theory of motion is an example. Einstein's theory of relativity, atomic theory - these are not "guesses", but prinicples that can be demonstrated in repeatable experiments. Evolution falls under the same category.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
The point is that the ID notion of irreducible complexity (that without every single part it is useless) is 100% wrong, and the flagella has use even in its intermediate stages.
First he says that there is no way that the meager mind of man can understand the impetus of life, and then in the next post goes on to say that he knows that evolution could not have happened.
Just sheer dishonest religious protecting.
A theory, as it is used in Science, is plausible general principle or body of principles offered to explain a phenomenon. Theories make predictions that can be tested. Newton's theory of motion is an example. Einstein's theory of relativity, atomic theory - these are not "guesses", but prinicples that can be demonstrated in repeatable experiments. Evolution falls under the same category.
Certainly not. Look up "scientific theory" and broaden your horizon.