Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Ken Miller talks about the bacterial flagellum

Ken Miller discusses the error of the 'poster child' of intelligent design. He discusses the evolutionary history of the bacterial flagellum and how the parts both in groups and alone have functio...  
 
Customize

More From: Kurpalac

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
207 ratings
Sign in to rate
16,605 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (662)   Options

Loading...
darrellmellissa (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I think he is describing Obamas brain.
darrellmellissa (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@FloydsterUtube , Go read our history, start with the old testiment, The book of enouch, The writings of the anchent summerians, It makes evoulution and creation blend bueatifuly, We are uplifted by beins called gods.
vanityvideo (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
yea you can remove your arm and use it as a stand for your wheelless car, but doesnt mean your arm was made for a stand for your car, im sorry but this argument is really stupid
Ryausub (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I don't think you understand how evolution works. The flagella was first used for other purposes, then slowly changed slightly making it useful in other ways. It kept changing slightly over time to be what it is now.

The point is that the ID notion of irreducible complexity (that without every single part it is useless) is 100% wrong, and the flagella has use even in its intermediate stages.
ladedk (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
" Oh Goodie!!" Hehe... Epic
guyinjeep16 (9 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
You gotta love Procommenter and his ignorance.
First he says that there is no way that the meager mind of man can understand the impetus of life, and then in the next post goes on to say that he knows that evolution could not have happened.
Just sheer dishonest religious protecting.
msholmes (9 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Right. His/her logic is completely absent.
cdnrktsci (10 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Theory is not at all a synonym of supposition or conjecture or guess. Read a science textbook.
A theory, as it is used in Science, is plausible general principle or body of principles offered to explain a phenomenon. Theories make predictions that can be tested. Newton's theory of motion is an example.  Einstein's theory of relativity, atomic theory - these are not "guesses", but prinicples that can be demonstrated in repeatable experiments. Evolution falls under the same category.
procommenter (10 months ago) Show Hide
 -8
Marked as spam
Gilmaris (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Dictionaries will have to be revised. "

Certainly not. Look up "scientific theory" and broaden your horizon.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.