Los Angeles Stadium Promo

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,984
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 31, 2010

The right choice, the right project, the right time.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (lastadium)

  • Hey everyone thanks for actively discussing this! We are working hard behind the scenes to get the stadium rolling. We are all approved and are hoping to get to construction sometime after the superbowl. Thanks for your support!

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @3bulletproof16 The casual fan doesn't take all these things into account. But the stadium needs to be more than just football. In order to increase the investors return on its investment the stadium needs to be functioning year around. Industry is to far away with nothing near by to hold the people there to have an economical impact. DT LA is exploding with new night life and great restaurants.

  • @3bulletproof16 I am in favor of less parking space. Less parking space would mean less tailgating. Tailgating in LA is just dangerous. Drunken gangsters causing trouble to other fans doesn't make up for a good family environment. Plus less parking would force people into taking the subway, metro rail, or metrolink which is far better for the environment then driving to the stadium in a car.

  • @3bulletproof16 the downtown Stadium is the better idea. Downtown has much better public transportation, and it will continue the economical growth of Los Angeles. The DT stadium will be used just about year around with it's retractable roof. i can only imagine the traffic horror on the 60 fwy getting to industry. The stadium being built should be built with more than football in mind. With a roof the stadium can hold more than just football. which means more money. It just makes business sense.

  • @MegaBobland the downtown Stadium is the better idea. Downtown has much better public transportation, and it will continue the economical growth of Los Angeles. The DT stadium will be used just about year around with it's retractable roof. i can only imagine the traffic horror on the 60 fwy getting to industry. The stadium being built should be built with more than football in mind.

  • @3bulletproof16 ncaa final 4, conventions or trade shows but building downtown stadium not good idea so roski house going to win

  • @XTR3M3xJOK3R WUT?

  • @3bulletproof16 u just hatting bitch 600 acre bitch 75,000 seats and its going to be one of the number1

  • Roski's 600acre 25K onsite parking site over AEGs 30 acre moleman site anyday

  • @drewtheripper Funny how AEG first said their 70,000seat retractable roof stadium (what stadium needs a damn roof in Cali) would cost under $750 Mill (clearly to make it seem cheaper than Roski's $800 Mill strategically designed stadium) Now AEG stated their's will be a little over a Billion. Its a 30acre site! How the hell are you going to move a mass of 70,000 people off a 30acre site? AEG designed that stadium without the fans, without people in mind.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more