-Evolution Quotes
"The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." - Charles Darwin 1902 edition.
"...I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science....It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts." Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, cited by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1991) pp. 456, 475.
"Nowhere was Darwin able to point to one bona fide case of natural selection having actually generated evolutionary change in nature....Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century." Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crises (Bethesda, Maryland: Adler & Adler, 1986) pp. 62, 358.
"I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science." Søren Løvtrup, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth (New York: Croom Helm, 1987), p. 422.
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact." Dr. T. N. Tahmisian Evolution and the Emperor's New Clothes by N.J. Mitchell (United Kingdom: Roydon Publications, 1983), title page.
"The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination." Albert Fleischmann. Witnesses Against Evolution by John Fred Meldau (Denver: Christian Victory Publishing, 1968), p. 13.
"[T]he theory suffers from grave defects, which are becoming more and more apparent as time advances. It can no longer square with practical scientific knowledge, nor does it suffice for our theoretical grasp of the facts...No one can demonstrate that the limits of a species have ever been passed. These are the Rubicons which evolutionists cannot cross...Darwin ransacked other spheres of practical research work for ideas...But his whole resulting scheme remains, to this day, foreign to scientifically established zoology, since actual changes of species by such means are still unknown." Albert Fleischmann, "The Doctrine of Organic Evolution in the Light of Modern Research," Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute 65 (1933): pp. 194-95, 205-6, 208-9.
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." Louis Bounoure. The Advocate, 8 March 1984, p. 17.
"And the salient fact is this: if by evolution we mean macroevolution (as we henceforth shall), then it can be said with the utmost rigor that the doctrine is totally bereft of scientific sanction. Now, to be sure, given the multitude of extravagant claims about evolution promulgated by evolutionists with an air of scientific infallibility, this may indeed sound strange. And yet the fact remains that there exists to this day not a shred of bona fide scientific evidence in support of the thesis that macroevolutionary transformations have ever occurred." Wolfgang Smith, Teilhardism and the New Religion (Rockford., Ill.: Tan Books, 1988), pp. 5-6. Dr. Smith, taught at MIT and UCLA.
"With the failure of these many efforts, science was left in the somewhat embarrassing position of having to postulate theories of living origins which it could not demonstrate. After having chided the theologian for his reliance on myth and miracle, science found itself in the inevitable position of having to create a mythology of its own: namely, the assumption that what, after long effort could not prove to take place today had, in truth, taken place in the primeval past." Loren Eisley, The Immense Journey (1957), p. 199.
"If complex organisms ever did evolve from simpler ones, the process took place contrary to the laws of nature, and must have involved what may rightly be termed the miraculous." R.E.D. Clark, Victoria Institute (1943), p.
" `Creation,' in the ordinary sense of the word, is perfectly conceivable. I find no difficulty in conceiving that, at some former period, this universe was not in existence, and that it made its appearance in six days (or instantaneously, if that is preferred), in consequence of the volition of some preexisting Being. Then, as now, the so-called a priori arguments against Theism and, given a Deity, against the possibility of creative acts, appeared to me to be devoid of reasonable foundation." Thomas H. Huxley, quoted in *L. Huxley, Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, Vol. I (1903), p. 241 (1903). 63
Loading...
53:43
Atheism Versus Reality - Dr. Bilal Philips.by Humm74511,438 views
That analogy was bullshit...I'm atheist someone told me to watch and heard nothing I haven't heard already
89whodatcha 2 weeks ago
I wish more muslims would read the theory of evolution for themselves without it being filtered by creationists or islamic scholars. I'd advise any muslim who wants to look at the evidence for themselves to read; A short history of nearly everything by Bill Bryson (a brilliant intro) and The greatest show on earth by Richard Dawkins. After that you will understand the evidence for yourself from non-creationist sources, and you can decide for yourself what you believe regarding the theory.
strangestdude 2 weeks ago
@StopSpamming1 Just for clarification, I'm not insulting you when I say you're confused. What I really mean is that you aren't really decided on what to say. Why are you here in the first place? You just randomly found this video, I mean what are you really searching for in life?
Yahyamanyah 3 weeks ago
@StopSpamming1
"cruel, invisible being"
Okay, let me give you a vague realization. The first verse of the Quran is: "In the name of God, the Lord of Mercy, the Giver of Mercy!" "Where? When? To whom?"
To prophet Muhammad through his angel Gabriel.
"Supposed words of Muhammad?"
Mohammed was illiterate, how could he reach a level Arabic in one day that cannot be reached until this very century? Again, you are confused young man.
Yahyamanyah 3 weeks ago
@Yahyamanyah
} "You're confused"
Really? Because I don't have blind faith? Because I don't believe in a cruel, invisible being as described in the Koran?
} "God said"
Where? When? To whom?
You mean the book called the Koran? Hardly.
And I don't know this sentence. Are you sure it is in the Koran? The words of a god? Or are you confusing this with the supposed words of Muhammad?
StopSpamming1 3 weeks ago
@Yahyamanyah your feelings*
Yahyamanyah 3 weeks ago
@StopSpamming1 You're confused. The world is divided into two elements. Elements that are tangible and elements that are intangible. For example, can you touch you're feelings, or are they detached from you're existence in general. They are not. But for reassurance, I will oppose you're message with this: God said "I was a hidden treasure, I would fain be known, so I created man."
Yahyamanyah 3 weeks ago
Masha'Allah love this brother
pillgrimz 1 month ago
@X3BOOODYX2012
So what makes you believe you know the characteristics of a god, when this god is so far removed from you and humans in general?
And why, if you allow for exceptions from logics and rational thinking, can't the same apply for the Universe?
I will not even address your childish example.
StopSpamming1 2 months ago