DNA - Evolutions Death Knell by Mark Eastman, M.D

Mark Eastman delivers a striking presentation on the amazing properties of DNA and explains how chance could have had played no part in the creation of this information packed super molecule.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Creation
• Evolultion
• Debate
• Atheist
• atheism
• atheists
• Mark
• Eastman
• Lecture
• Jesus
• God

[PaulKJHarris]

Chumnah: you looked up a SECOND article? Why not look at the THOUSANDS of articles on this subject. Sounds to me like you are intellectually lazy and just don't want to look. Evolution has been observed in real time, game over, evolution wins, period.

[Chumnah]

@PaulKJHarris Why dont you save me some time filtering the deceptive articles out there and provide me with a single example of REAL 'evolution observed in real time'. I just know it does not exist so looking for something that is not there is counter productive. Just one example please. And btw, can you answer my question, if you can do it accurately and it stands up to scrutiny, I will post a video of me rejecting Christ as my Lord and Savior and admit and I was completely wrong.

[PaulKJHarris]

Chumnah: You looked up ONE article??? Keep looking. One article alone is not going to demonstrate what I said. The evolution observed was in microorganisms, not finches. Evolution is what causes us to need new flu vaccines every year. For a vastly superior explanation than what I can give look up Aron Ra's series as it will explain it a lot better than I can. Also see the Talk Origins web page. One article alone does not disprove evolution. Do that and you will win the Nobel Prize. Good luck.

[Chumnah]

@PaulKJHarris Hey Paul, I did look at a second link also as I have posted, about bacteria that is claimed to 'evolve' and is in direct relation to your flu vaccine analogy. This is not evolution as the theory demands morphological change in which NONE is observed. Please answer my question if you will.

[PaulKJHarris]

Not going to debate the delusional, Chumnah. Evolution has been observed in real time, as it happened, on more than one occasion. What does this mean? It means "game over, evolution wins". Look up "evolution observed in real time". Its there.

[Chumnah]

LOL, Looking further, and the next one is about bacteria becoming resistant to certain antibiotics.

Again, no morphological change, just a chemical change or adaptation due to a loss of information, which is not evolution.

One question from me to you would be "Could you please provide me one instance of any organism that has had a gain of information on a genetic level that resulted in new morphological structures on said organism ?"

Provide that to me and maybe ill put the good book down.

[ricdon1515]

fuck god...................die fucker

[hitech98]

Chumnah- Debating a Atheist is like arguing with a bag of rocks. It seems prayer is the best way to handle them. Thanks for posting this.

And the light shines in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

John 1:5

[PaulKJHarris]

Chumnah: evolution and Christianity are two separate issues. The fact that you state that you "just know it does not exist" tells me everything I need to know. You don't want to learn - you are willfully ignorant. Unfortunate.

[Chumnah]

@PaulKJHarris Ok, I typed in "evolution observed in real time" into google and clicked the first link which was a MSNBC article about evolutionary changes of finches observed in real time on the Galapagos,

This article is very misleading and it proves nothing as the morphology of the finch did not change. The varied kinds of finch populations on the Galapagos rise an fall with different environmental conditions. This is not 'evolution observed in real time' as the article states.Very Deceptive