First Moon Landing 1969

@ PlayboyHZ. People like you are the reason this world is so screwed up. For many reasons I personally do not believe that the moon landing was faked. Nevertheless what you think is irrelevant, your myopic opinion is your own business. However you come accross as an inane little know it all and I am betting you are not even out of school yet. Don't sit there on your computer and insult people with your stupid and childish comments. It is possible to have an argument and not resort to insults.

@PlayboyHZ At the time, many radio amateurs tracked the Apollo missions. This being the height of the cold war, you can bet the Russians were also listening intently. With the signal's Doppler shift the ship could be tracked accurately. Impossible to fake. Please explain how NASA accomplished this.

Woo lunch time in Aus! That reminds me...I'm hungry

It didn´t take 40 years, but it´s only been in the last couple of years the Japan, India, China and the US have returned probes to the moon.

Now, while it appears I am delivering facts and references, it seems all you can do now is return insults and mock my entirely reasonable statements.

Either step up your game, or cease. Also, it´s lunchtime here in Aus, so I can stick around for a while if you´d care to continue.

Wow, god.. You are really a dumbas.. You telling me that it took 40 years of development to find out if there was any water on the moon.. No shit dude. Look around, the technology is getter better every minut.. And your saying 40 years.. WOW, DUDE, GO SLEEP AND DONT TELL BULLSHIT

Shockingly, you haven´t entertained the the idea that instruments and detectors used for detecting water might have gotten a little better over the intervening 40 years of development.

Or that these very same instruments are looking in different areas of the moon, rather that the Earth-facing equatorial area that the Apollo missions landed in.

Dude, you must either be the biggest dumbass, or the biggest retard.. If people had been on the moon for about 40 years ago, dont you think they would have known that there was water on the moon.. But no, they just discovered water on moon resently.. :')

Denouncing my reputation or intelligence isn´t going a long way to proving your theory that the moon landings were faked.

I´ll re-itereate. Is there any compelling proof of fakery, or are you simply maintaining that there is some vast cover-up that every scientist is paid to say is true... My fiance works in a lab as a microbiologists, maybe I should ask her about her NASA hush money.

Yep yep yep.. I'll bet 100 bucks that you have no clue what your saying.. Now go to bed kid..

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and so far no-one has produced any definitive or compelling evidence that this really was fake.

Unless you have something other than unverifiable accusations that 'scientists are paid to say it's true'.