John Stossel Discusses Distortions in the Global Warming Debate

A video segment created by the journalist John Stossel for ABC Television show 20/20 examines issues concerning global warming, showing how the issues are often extremely exaggerated by politicians and the media.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• john-stossel
• global-warming
• 20-20
• abc-news
• denier
• al-gore
• John-Christy
• Roy-Spencer
• Paul-Reiter

[1HumanKind]

@PacificCircle1

I thought you were interested in learning to think, and not a cheep parody. Your insistent use of cliche in place of lucid thought proves I was wrong. You would not write about politics or sarcasm or that I claim meteorology examines gravity if you were capable of self generated intellectual integrity. You did prove your motivation however.

"meteorology examins not"? You do not need to pretend you are something you are not. No one is fooled.

[AwesomeCoasters]

@PacificCircle1 dha :)

[PacificCircle1]

@terrellma climate modeling is just that. Scientic theories are not lies but more like educated quessing.

[PacificCircle1]

@AwesomeCoasters Too cryptic! Perhaps a-fucking-men is some biblical reference.

[PacificCircle1]

@terrellma Truth = scare tatics? Propaganda = scare, at lest in bizarro reverso world of Tea types.

[PacificCircle1]

@1HumanKind Proof is the essence of all things.

By all means , let's reject science; I hear the Dark Ages were nice.

You must learn extremism can implode - see GOP run at president.

Meteorology examins not gravity.

What do hope to accomplish by your comments - rattle my chains?

[1HumanKind]

@PacificCircle1

you need to look up the word proof.

"metrological" concepts do not prove anything about the climate neither do meteorological concepts. They do prove things about climatologists and their assumptions.

You also should learn about how to identify your own errors, to accept them as such, and to develop intellectual integrity.

Also, we don't know what gravity is with certainty (meaning proof), but we do have meteorological (and physical) concepts about it.

[PacificCircle1]

@terrellma climate change is proved by basic metrological concepts - getting difinitive proof is harder to do.

Like gravity, we know what it is, but proving the basis of it, well, see Albert Einstien

[terrellma]

@PacificCircle1 See the comment I made above. Al Gore made millions on his scare tactics.

[terrellma]

The human race DOES have an effect on the environment but the global ecosystem and environment is far too complex for humanity to understand. The question is what is the purpose of this lie? Who benefits?