Bogosity Ep. 2: Evolution vs. Creation (Part 2)

Part 2 of 2.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• skeptic
• debunk
• randi
• plait
• badastronomer

[5tonyvvvv]

@bryansteeksma Racemic mixtures is the problem

[bryansteeksma]

@5tonyvvvv Well, I will go read up on it. I am open to new perspectives. Can the same be said for you? We`ll see; I`ve never heard of Homochirality before.

As a side note, you`re points would be a little more palatable if you weren`t such a self-righteous douche about it. ;)

Or are you not interested in genuine discussion,l but instead want to dictate to others your ``truth`` while spitting in their faces?

[shanedk]

@5tonyvvvv See the work of Dr. Jack Szostak. You are completely, utterly, and PATHETICALLY wrong.

[5tonyvvvv]

@bryansteeksma Go learn what Homochirality is Moron.. molecules never organize them selves into life, and thats what evolutionary scientists expect to believe ASSUMPTIONS!!!, all you have to do is put time and chance with it, and the chemistry works!! what BULLSHIT!!!, and thats some faith!!

[bryansteeksma]

@5tonyvvvv Good one. How could I have been so blind. "You clearly know nothing" and "Moron"! Superb points! Its so clear to me now. Thank you for enlightening me. Guess I better get on my knees, pronto, before the world ends and I am cast into eternal flames.

You're right about one thing: panspermia, "space crystals", and aliens as explanations only begs the question. But your "theory" only begs the question also. It does nothing to explain the nature of this intelligence, or where it came from

[5tonyvvvv]

@bryansteeksma LOL..You clearly know nothing, your just another indoctrinated moron!

[bryansteeksma]

@5tonyvvvv Friend, you can spew all the genetic jargon you like. It does not make you correct. Why? Because you are still a far-cry away from adumbrating the bridge between a creator God to an intervening God.

Using structural engineering as an analogy does not help you.

Logically, I do not have to refute any of your finer points. When it comes down to it, you cannot demonstrate why intelligence is the only, falsifiable, answer to why sentient life exists.

[5tonyvvvv]

@bryansteeksma undirected natural processes, never produce life.homochirality, has never been solved, and as for panspermia and space crystals, and aliens seeding life on earth, that answers nothing only pushes the problem out into space!

[5tonyvvvv]

@bryansteeksma Abiogenesis and evolution are very much connected...Tell an architect to build a skyscraper using no foundation, no base.just have the building float in thin air..let me me know what they will tell you..and how and when this great feat of engineering can be done..you need life to start in order for it to evolve....its nothing more than stubborn arrogant logic by evolutionists.

[5tonyvvvv]

@bryansteeksma "This engineered RNA" would break down do to the unstable conditions of it..similar to rats leaving a sinking ship..This artificial RNA..has ZERO chance of further evolving into a living cell.

Activated subunits are used along with templates taken from living sources..its not a geochemical relevant reaction.Intelligence created life not time and chance