Scott Masons audio blog examines the Tea Parties, Sarah Palin, The Liberty Movement, possible 2012 Presidential Candidates, and why Gary Johnson is the man for the job. www.FreeSpeechMonster.com
Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Palin is NOT a Tea Partier. WE can place Dr. Paul in office no matter what!!!!! So what if he's in his 70's people are living into their 100s and Ron Paul thinks quicker and clearer than I do and I'm less than half his age, with a farely high IQ (I'm not bragging).
I DON'T think Paul has "charisma" (well more than Gary if Paul has ANY), I don't give shit about "charisma"; I care about voting for RIGHT candidate, NOT "charismatic" candidate & I certainly would NOT vote for someone (gary) who's pro-open-borders & has ties to CFR which is effectively the face of one-world-government
The quote you've put up is somehow the ONLY time Paul ever"endorsed" Johnson, that quote I believe is either completely fake or misinterpreted.
PLEASE don't spread misinformation, please watch >>> watch?v=sARgIeZpsDs#t=7m15s Did you see Paul endorsing Johnson??? I didn't. It's TOO OBVIOUS he's going to run, many people who're close to him like Dr Tom Woods for example thinks Paul WILL run, there's very little mystery about it, now he's making headway, just became Chairman of Banking sub-committee & his popularity is spreading like wildfire & more people are questioning Fed's existence ONLY because of him
Please stop this BS, stop cutting Ron Paul's support, Johnson has no name recognition, nothing, he's NO CHANCE of winning 2012, all he's going to do is split Paul's votes & we'll get another term of Obama & US will fast forward into socialism & corporatism & communism.
Paul is very fit for age, he's very healthy & his support has grown tremendously after last election & 2012 is the time to cash in on that so YOU stop kidding yourself & recognize that Paul ihas WAYYY better chance than Johnson
Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Palin is NOT a Tea Partier. WE can place Dr. Paul in office no matter what!!!!! So what if he's in his 70's people are living into their 100s and Ron Paul thinks quicker and clearer than I do and I'm less than half his age, with a farely high IQ (I'm not bragging).
ultrafamousgirl 1 year ago 2
@tecknotroniks
I DON'T think Paul has "charisma" (well more than Gary if Paul has ANY), I don't give shit about "charisma"; I care about voting for RIGHT candidate, NOT "charismatic" candidate & I certainly would NOT vote for someone (gary) who's pro-open-borders & has ties to CFR which is effectively the face of one-world-government
The quote you've put up is somehow the ONLY time Paul ever"endorsed" Johnson, that quote I believe is either completely fake or misinterpreted.
Ron Paul 2012
lomocan 1 year ago
@tecknotroniks
PLEASE don't spread misinformation, please watch >>> watch?v=sARgIeZpsDs#t=7m15s Did you see Paul endorsing Johnson??? I didn't. It's TOO OBVIOUS he's going to run, many people who're close to him like Dr Tom Woods for example thinks Paul WILL run, there's very little mystery about it, now he's making headway, just became Chairman of Banking sub-committee & his popularity is spreading like wildfire & more people are questioning Fed's existence ONLY because of him
Ron Paul 2012
lomocan 1 year ago
Please stop this BS, stop cutting Ron Paul's support, Johnson has no name recognition, nothing, he's NO CHANCE of winning 2012, all he's going to do is split Paul's votes & we'll get another term of Obama & US will fast forward into socialism & corporatism & communism.
Paul is very fit for age, he's very healthy & his support has grown tremendously after last election & 2012 is the time to cash in on that so YOU stop kidding yourself & recognize that Paul ihas WAYYY better chance than Johnson
lomocan 1 year ago 2
Ron Paul has plenty of years left.. Give him his deserved 4 years to 'pave the way' for a much better U.S.
cervantessssssssssss 2 years ago 2