Democrat and Liberal Double Standards on Race and Gender
Loading...
209
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (Hunterkirk)
see all
All Comments (6)
-
I'm sure you don't. You are also a pawn, not a "power" piece (no insult intended). It is the powerful that are resposible for the condition of our society. To understand the culture of a people, you must first understand the institutions that govern them. Actually, people don't have their own ideas, although they think they do. They simply make choices that are provided to them by the higher authorities.
-
It's true, thanks for speaking out Kirk
-
Have you heard about the "Southern strategy"?
Loading...
(4:57-5:12) Clarence Thomas was not the first supreme court justice; Thurgood Marshall '67 was the first supreme court justice.
jblackmel 2 years ago
Correction noted, thanks...
Still does not change the fact that Democrats don't rejoice in minority race people getting positions of power if they are not Democrats, in fact they demonize such people as traitors to their race.
Hunterkirk 2 years ago
Of course. That's what white supremacy means: You are okay as long as you are under "our" tuteledge. I never thought that the so-called "liberals" truly embraced non-white empowerment. White supremacy is a "system" not a small faction. It is a system, not a political party. So-called "feminism," "gay activists," "concervatives," all beat the same drum: "You people can help push 'our' agenda, but you will not help run the show. You are to only be a face to our movement, but not the brains.
jblackmel 2 years ago
I will tell you true I as a conservative don't give a rat ass about anyone's race. I do care about what a leader wants to do,
But who knows maybe I am just a exception to a rule I don't notice.
Hunterkirk 2 years ago
I don't think you're being entirely fair. Dems don't just want an AfAm or women in office for the Affirmative Action components, but they want people who will be effective as leaders as well. Hillary Clinton was a woman and a Dem, and they didn't vote for her. Libs don't like Palin because she's inexperienced and not abreast of the issues. I will admit they can be too concerned with superficial diversity, but they dont have to jump at the 1st prospects given.
sblxi 3 years ago
Here is the problem with that theory.... the ONLY women and minority they feel is going to be a good leader are only democrats or liberals. That in fact proves my arguement that it isnt about the person being a women or a minorite race it is about the person being a liberal and a democrat.
Clinton even with her defeat has not been as closely investigated by the media... if they did then we would be hearing stories about the millions the Clinton recieved from Communist China.
Hunterkirk 3 years ago