Interview - Marco Kaltofen - Airborne Radiation Spread

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,189
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 6, 2011

Interview with Marco Kaltofen, PE, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, about his research studying airborne radioactive particles from Fukushima and the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ...and that there within is the plausible deniability within the liability of the Nuclear Industry;

    ~but in tort law it is the accused that must prove they are not guilty

    =so things change with class action lawsuit

    +going forwards must require a surety of hard assets be posted equal to maximum damage possible of every nuclear fuel potential contamination source before licence is granted as their is no way to bring accountability in balance with the authority after a release or radio nuclides

  • Thank you

  • The mass delusion that America embraces regarding the ongoing and expanding global nuclear contamination crisis, spells a tragic end for all humanity -- inclusive of the 1% and their cherished investment portfolios. Humanity does not possess the wisdom to manage nuclear energy -- its continued use is the devil of our self-destruction.

  • @bitfed

    How could any intelligent person fail to find the well documented evidence of those two atomic bombs?

  • Nuclear Power = Insanity!

  • @connectingdots1 The difference between scientists and you is that they can produce evidence of their claims. So inferior to your reasoning...I know.

  • @connectingdots1 SCIENCE! So where is your data on the effects of the atomic bombs we dropped on them?

  • @cosmiccowboy92021, Actually UCB measured a soil sample from Oakland CA at 4.91 Bq/kg Cs137. [1] Kaltofen reports a US soil sample with 8 nCi/kg of radiocesium. [2] Since 1 nCi = 37 Bq, [3] Kaltofen's sample was 8*37 = 296 Bq/kg, which is 60x, not 10,000%, higher. Fallout does not spread uniformly, and UCB's soil survey is very limited.

    Google:

    [1] UCB Food Chain Sampling Results

    [2] 254015 Radiation Exposure to the Population in Japan

    [3] Radiation Measurement Units - International (SI)

  • @rpur441044 Thank you

    people should thumbs up your comment because this is exactly what I also see going on here.

    Infant mortality rates have ALREADY increasing by UP to 48% in one US city while in 8 others it's up by 35% !

    DEATHS IS at our door step already!

    ,we're lead to believe that the radiation is " ISOLATED "

    ya it's isolated alright, it's isolated right in our drinking water!..and bio-accumulating in fields,but don't worry it's isolated!

    & now 30 yrs before it's contained? wow

  • @GoddardsJournal My mistake, Marco Kalofen says it at 10:03 in this interview about "there are just too many isolated spots." From Energy News, (University Researcher: U.S. topsoil with up to 8,000 pCi/kg of cesium from Fukushima — Over 10,000% higher than highest levels found by UC Berkeley) he prefaces this with "Isolated US soil samples." Mr. Kaltofen was not misquoted on this, when referring to the paper he submitted to the American Public Health Association (10/31/11), its a direct quote.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more