Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

CFL Table Candle with Power Module charging

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,456
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 6, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Lidmotor)

  • sorry to hear your not feeling well lidmotor.

    joe tates circuit appears to act on a similar principle to the radiant oscillators we are building. using radio waves via antenna to excite a high voltage source.

    wat are the values of c1 c2 c3 c4??

  • dodoshlodo--I used the correct 100uf for the larger ones (C3&C4) but I used .01uf instead of the .2uf (C1&C2) that Joe called for. It was just what I had on hand. I will get the correct ones and try those. Also will try the long wire antenna outside. Lots of stray RF where I live.

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • how could i power a 14 watt/ 120 volt CFL, with out its actual socket?

  • if you say that a cheap system that cold recharge/regenerate dead batteries with low power consumation is nothing special you will have no credit for me ... abaut perepiteia Thane have help from people from the university (professors and students ) the tecnical language he is using for me is very compreensive and correct if you don´t agree i don´t now how he can do better ! remember you are sayng that him and the entire university have no credit and Dr. Markus Zahn is blind !.....

  • you are saing that the circuit is complete !were is a potential diference to make the electrons corrent ? now i´m using a solid state system because i now we don´t need the rotor and the magnetes for nothing ! so in secondary battery i measure less than 40% of input power going to the batt, but i now after many tests that when i disconect the batt i have much much power stored in that battery you can´t denie it !!!make this tests and put it in a video on youtube is virtually imposseble !

  • I will try to explain it. The fact that the two batteries are connected to each other is not very important. What is important is that when the coil discharges, the pulse of current goes through the diode, through the secondary battery charging it, and then back to the other side of the coil. This makes a complete circuit and allows the charging current to flow.

    The diode isolates the secondary battery from the rest of the circuit so that it has no real affect on the circuit.

  • A simple example for a Bedini setup: Imagine the source battery is 90% charged and three target batteries are 0% charged.  You run the motor and at the end the source battery is 0% charged and each of the three target batteries are 30% charged. That proves nothing, correct? For your example of COP 1.1 I would have to see the measurement system they used and the data. No one on YouTube is seriously making an attempt to show credible measurements and data. It is always the case.

  • You are correct there is new news on YouTube. I watched one of his clips that is from last week. He has been researching this stuff for years and still he cannot use the proper technical language to describe what he is doing. This is very disappointing and I was not impressed with what I saw. I think his credibility as a serious researcher was ruined by his inability to use the right technical words. I doubt his Perepiteia project will ever work.

  • a simple thing i guess you cold explain is that we are using the " - " of the secondary battery conected to the "+" of the input and using the "+" of the secondary batt conected to the "+" to ( passing by the coil of corse ).

    cold you explain how the circuit works ?

  • some people that have equipement to measure are reporting a cop abaut 1.1 after 20 cicles of charge/discharge they didn´t call to the press because they considered that isn´t a sufficient result ! they want more !but i remember you again they measured less than 40% of input power in the output !i bealiave you agree with me if for example we have a death battery after 3 years of use and after a charge with this system we have a battery like new for 1 or 2 years that´s something great !

  • abaut perepiteia i digragree with you ! Thane has made new improvements week after week please pay atention to his work on youtube !

    in bedini case i belive you now that we measure less than 40% of input power in the output so in many cases we are using less than a 1 Watt to push a rotor with hi rpm , we have losses in the coil and in other parts of the system and we are charging 4 batteries at the same time !so it is at least a great result !

  • There is no recent news about the Perepiteia or the university professors that investigated it. Do not be surprised if in five years there is no Perepiteia device in existence. Perhaps in five years you can explain what happened to the Perepiteia motor. Look up "MagnaCoaster", another Canadian company with a "magic device" that is supposed to be ready next month, February 2009.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more