Shermer vs Hovind (Lucy, Carbon Dating)
Uploader Comments (joshdavidian)
All Comments (83)
-
9.10 Kent can't resent paying taxes for something when you don't actually pay tax?
-
There is a well known correlation between belief in miracles and a limited understanding of science...Peolpe who fit in this category don't value evidence either...
-
It's funny to how Shermer is continuously breaking sweat.
-
Kent Responses demonstrate a great ability... to quote mine. Finding things in nature all over the world and the Universe at large is a science success story. We know more about extinct apes and the related dates than we know about King David and his court? Funny thing about Carbon-14 dating, it really best for dating plants, wood and botanical seeds... dating bones and living animals (snails and sea lions) isn't the best use of those techniques.
-
Ha-ha. This convicted felon and stand up comic is calling evolution a religion. He's not only revealing his massive ignorance of science, but he's, in effect, giving a great reason why creationism doesn't belong in science class.
-
Why don' you explain how this "intelligent designer" did it. Give a scientific analysis and detail it step by step.
-
Google "talk origins Creationist Arguments: Homo habilis" and click the first result.
That site includes discussions of all the KNM-ER fossils you mentioned, maybe some of the others.
-
Yeah, Rev. Hovind, evolution is a religion and our favorite hymn is Give Me That Old Time Speciation.
-
Dr. Shermer is a joke--the cell and the universe are actually supreme examples that an intelligent designer created everything so he just proved dr. kent hovind right without knowing it lol
-
Eintein once said, "Religion without science is blind and science without religion is dumb." The two go together and you cannot separate them
Why'd you chop the video? Where is the full debate posted?
FYI There are far better ways than carbon dating which only works up to 50,000 years and in certain situations.
CBUEngineer 3 years ago
I took the best arguments for both side I could. The debate was over two hours.
joshdavidian 3 years ago