Mac vs. Pc: The Windows 7 Letters -Part 1

I may turn this into a weekly quick vid. Not only do I get tons of emails, I also read tons of them sent by others users to other users on forums and news sites. Here is one 2 pertaining to windows 7. Stay tuned for my next video "The Linux Letter Part 1".

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• emeek77
• final
• cut
• pro
• motion
• soundtrack
• compressor
• livetype
• mac
• vs
• pc
• vista
• windows
• macintosh
• apple
• tutorials
• 3D
• modeling
• shake
• compositing
• xp
• steve
• jobs
• bill
• gates
• battle
• computers
• war
• technology
• maya
• 3dsmax
• cinema4D
• sucks
• fight
• Houdini
• Tutorial
• render
• Nuke
• Fusion
• Windows7
• ubuntu
• linux
• unix
• sun
• pixelmator
• modo
• luxology
• applesoldier

[AppleSoldier]

Retard? That's harsh dude.

[beekydogg]

is everyone that watches this an idiot? can you not read the title? or description? its a fucking email from someone else. your eyes are for reading more than what your writing to bash someone. probably before you watched the video.

[AppleSoldier]

glad to see at least one person takes the time to read the description and notice the WEB SITE I put in the video. Thanks for getting my back dude. And I Really mean that.

[BiohazProductions]

I installed windows 7 rc on a 10 year old desktop and it ran and booted up twice as fast as xp. you probably used the oldest cheapest peice of crap hardware u could find.

[AppleSoldier]

i dont believe you, no offense.

[LynamoMusic]

I detect a mac fanboy.

[bisnumber1]

you know whats better than

Mac and PC

SEX!

End of Story

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

he he, well I must admit I like some of the newer games, and honestly do heavy work on the computer so having the massive powerful hardware to back that is must, and windows 7 runs beautiful on hardware that can fully support it. Though as of now, I'd call ps2 more classic gaming >.> though I'm going to get a PS2 emulator to play my FF12, I just have to think about the dual-shock2 in the controller that it wants, and other games use.

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

OC, and enough ram. though in all honesty if your a gamer, there is no real reason to use hardware like that. Yes, the brandnew hardware is cost, but honestly even my i7-960 is now suggested 140 USD, and that's on the new SANDYBRIDGE archetype on intel boards that's only about 6 months old.

*shrugs* though I do think some gamers are just crazy and try to play games on os's just because. (I played Halo 2 on my WIndows XP, despite the fact it required DX10)

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

nice, doesn't make it a good idea honestly, since more apps and games for vista need ALOT more power then the P3 could provide.

I installed vista and win 7 RC on my old P4, and honestly they ran decent, but I couldn't do anything with them at all, without it slowing down massively.

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

I'll have to check it out(firefox 3.6.6), but youtube has been dicking around on the videos for nearly a month, and somehow just today broken things for me. Which is annoying >.>

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

I would suggest you can't complain because you choose to use OLDER & reliable computer parts, making upgrading OS a bad bad bad idea for you.

All i know is windows 95 [all versions] support was dropped for it's age / and VB that was bundled with the discs.(atleast in the USA, though I doubt highly UK would still be on that OS, since it is fairly unsecure and isn't good for alot of business use.

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

lol, yes Firefox would be slow on older hardware, but that's not the point it's fast on mine. I've got to use another browser because I can't view view videos(on the video page, but home pages still work, good grief youtube get a fucking video player and stick with it assholes) due to some HTML5 not being recognized. Firefox 4 supports it, while firefox 5 doesn't .. I'm confused on that one personally.

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

Well yes, win 2000 is reliable, I would not say it wasn't I just said it was horrible for game devs having it's own issues with them. Gaming just wasn't Window 2000 strong suit.

If you don't like DRM, and do what you can to avoid it.... I don't respect you because yes, I torrent things and do other stuff that I shouldn't and if windows 7 has DRM, I've not seen it stop me once, but with that said I am willing to buy the games as well.

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

Window 2000 was a good office OS and business computer as well, though that being said it was almost as bad as Windows NT was when it came to gaming, and was a pain in every devs side with it's special issues that had to be addressed, and to be respectful, windows XP was there and a FAR better choice for devs.

I'm sorry you get told that, but that's YouTube (google) and even now they screwed up the web so I need another browser and i'm using firefox 5.01.

Fucking HTML 5

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

Honestly, if your complaining about companies not making products for your windows anymore and your using and OS greater then 8-10 years old, you've got an issue.

If your using an OS that had dropped support (95 [all versions, a, b, c] and ME [just digital puke]) and you are complaining, there are actually solid reasons to not use those for the everyday user.

I've never seen Microsoft tech support ever tell someone they have to upgrade when they get asked about problem X.

[Kerns0Phoegon]

@davejoshmom1

Oh for pity sake. True that developers move on to newer systems, either by choice or force, but by the time that does happen and you want to play a good game, even if it was available for you OS, you don't have the hardware to back it up, so your point is mute. That point as far as utilities is worthless, since by that point also, there is 1-4 VERY good software that will stay for your OS in the Utilities that you want.

Microsoft doesn't force you to upgrade, (except special)