Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Flying Elephant: Evidence for Involvement of a Third Jet

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
133,897
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 28, 2006

High quality video:
http://www.blogtext.org/andy/article/6020.html

No mention of a large, commercial-class aircraft loitering in the restricted airspace of lower
Manhattan during the strikes on the WTC towers will be found in the 9/11 Commission Report.
It does not appear in any version of the Official Story. It is largely unknown even in critical
studies of 9/11. Yet substantial evidence exists to support its presence coincident with the
attacks, actually orbiting in close proximity to the towers for several minutes while the North
Tower burned and the South Tower was struck. Photography, video footage and eyewitness
accounts, including FDNY transcripts and mainstream media audio, confirm this fact.
Why is this significant? Let us consider the commercial air traffic on a typical Tuesday morning
over New York City. There are three major airports servicing the city: La Guardia and JFK
International to the east, and Newark International across the Hudson to the west. Normal
holding patterns for these airports do not intersect the borough of Manhattan at any point. Lower
Manhattan is, and was on the morning of 9/11/01, a low-altitude flight-restricted (no fly) zone
for commercial jets, as designated by the FAA, for the obvious reason that heavy, fast-moving
aircraft and tall buildings pose mutual hazards. Air traffic near the WTC towers was doubly
restricted, with a minimum ceiling extending two thousand feet above the towers (3,300 feet)
within a radius of one nautical mile, excepting only police aviation without special permit. These
were the VFR (visual flight rules) parameters in effect on the morning of 9/11. Once WTC1 was
hit, the black smoke plume expanding southeast from the tower would pose an additional threat
to navigation.
No avoidance warning from Air Traffic Control would be necessary, as no rational commercial
pilot (no matter how curious) would risk his aircraft, crew or passengers in a "fly-by" of the
burning North Tower. But in this anonymous Camera Planet segment we see a large, twin-jet
aircraft (757/767-class) doing just that at approximately 8:58am (assuming the time signature is
uncorrected by one hour), five minutes before WTC2 will be struck. Even disregarding the
indicated time, as WTC1 is burning and WTC2 is not, the segment is clearly recorded between
8:46am and 9:03am. Note this white aircraft with dark engines and vertical stabilizer is not the
aircraft that will impact WTC2.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 69 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (gyco7)

  • tbr8407

    you couldnt debate anyone with the bullshit emotion you are using as logic. emotion isnt reason. for you to argue that if i dont like the country i should leave? fuck you. i own this place, like i own the fucking banks and the car manufactors. eat shit and live. this is my god damn country and the free people that are not eating shit in front of a couch all day watching entertainment for news.

    steel and concrete can not fall faster through themselves, than they can through air.

Top Comments

  • Indicated airspeed for a jet engine doesn't vary with altitude.

    And there is more oxygen the lower you are, not less.

    And even an empty airliner would fall out of the sky at 100mph.

  • Haha you make a point in your comment bro...Please remember though, much as I agree with you, and hate pulling things apart..The truth is, there really is so much more to all of this...really. We are so conditioned in a quick-fix society we like to just see what happened only on the surface, assume thats it, and move on. Unfortunately it never works that way :/

Video Responses

This video is a response to Mystery Planes Witnessed on 9/11
see all

All Comments (315)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it wont let me view the video. where can i find it?

  • @gyco7

    HEY, THERE YOU GO AGAIN FIGHTING WITH SOMEONE YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW!! DON'T YOU ALL REALIZE THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT TO CAUSE STRIFE BETWEEN THE PEOPLE!! YOU ARE SUCCUMBING TO THEIR WISHES! DON'T BECAUSE IF YOU DO WE WILL ALL LOSE!!

  • @gyco7 stfu jew ass mother freaker thats my way of life ur talking about there

  • nice zoom on that camera

  • @letsgoforajoyride Yeah you dumbass, there were about 7000+ other fliers out that morning too.

  • What people fail to understand is that There are Pilots(respected) Who claim That No plane Could fly This low, and hit a building even 2 at such low airspeed without an advanced Career flying such jets. So no terrorist who traied in a Cesna as we are told to belive Could have flown these into the towers.

  • @gyco7 And how do you call this evidence of anything? It's fucking bullshit you yankee cunt!

  • search for video 9-11 WTC Rare Angle Reveals, Accidental Discovery.

    it is mine i made and i noticed a third jet too, you can see it more clearly and long on the video. there was definitely a third flyer in the air.

  • I'd be more likely to believe in the flying elephant theory.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more