Undertaker vs Triple h Promo
Top Comments
All Comments (30)
-
@avbaba Hahahaha.
-
@dudeme12 Wrong The Undertaker is way better than Triple H Undertaker wasn't a mid-carder he was a main-eventer and Triple H is boring he never changes his moves he never adds anything new to his career.
-
@dudeme12 Not mentioning Foley as a major player? that's a paddlin.
-
@dudeme12 yes so true
-
@dudeme12 mh...but Undertaker and Triple H are 2 of the most famous wrestler :>
-
@basix96 undertake won coz his contract has "no loss at wrestlemania" written and signed by vince... it true
undertaker cant ever lose at wrersltmania..
even if hbk and hhh had 25 more shots.... they still have to job to him.
-
@dudeme12 BUT WHO WIn @ Wm 27 Undertaker or The Game?
-
@wwedeadman85 the fights no are real men, the undertaker have a contract heleft the work of fights in wwe invict in wrestlemania, i know for good zone
-
@ceron2008 he wasnt better @ wrestlemania the so called 'the game' lost
Taker is better than HHH
thefinger123456 3 years ago 18
Attitude era had only 3 major players = AuStin , ROCK & HHH
and all the rest were upper mid carders including Undertaker... every time anyone of the upper mid carders were in the main event it involved one of these 3 main guys!!
So i beleive HHH is better than taker!
Taker may have been longer than hhh in the company but when it comes all around entertainer HHH is superior.
HHH can switch gimmicks from badass heel to funny face just in secs and make u believe it..
He carried wwe since 2002.
dudeme12 8 months ago 9