Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

South Carolina, Super Tuesday, and Ron Paul

http://www.WagTheDog2010.com -- A 10 minute college course on the Honest Elections vs. Computer Votefraud Syndicate Issue.  
 
Customize

More From: JimConditJr

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

314 ratings
Sign in to rate
11,615 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (2)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (111)   Options

Loading...
primogennaio (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The message is right on. But most Americans are more interested in sports, American Idol, beer and MTV than vote fraud. We are a nation of six pack joes. No wonder the liberals and politicians see us as a bunch of lazy, disinterested dopes.
54spiritedwill54 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Wake up America, your votes are being robbed. As Jim states, all the campaigning, sign waving and canvassing in the world won't mean a hill of beans if are votes are stolen. We need to demand publicly hand-counted paper ballots.
Abbelin (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Keep up the good work.

These videos are too long, it doesn't bother me but I think you lose a lot of people in the length of the video.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
YouTubReptilian (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Evidence of vote flipping in every state ... johnmccainDOTmeetupDOTcom/abou t/ AND ronpaulDOTmeetupDOTcom/about/
stophateing (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
great work get it to the puplic before it is to late again and again time is running out till 2012
utjjjbbb (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Great stuff, Jim. Your considerable involvement with this issue is MUCH appreciated. The NH primary was obviously fraudulent on the Dem side. There is no f-ing way Hillary could have lost handily in the hand-count districts and won handily in the Diebold districts. I'm a statistician and have gone over the results carefully. The disparity between Diebold and hand-count districts is WAAAAY too big to rationalize by any statistical measure or model.
Jaspian (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
There's no analysis about it, sir

1) The proof is in the pudding. Almost everything about the primaries supports that candidate-selection by political parties is not a function of the government, it is a function of the party, which is an independent entity

2) There are no laws supporting YOUR claim. My claim is the default position. Parties are not part of the Gov, and only need to follow their own rules. YOU need to cite laws

3) Louisiana changing their Republican Enrollment date? Evidence
JimConditJr (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Dear Jaspian,

There are a body of statutes in each state governing primaries and party organizational meetings. These began to be put into place about 1900. It is not a free for all, but I will admit that the parties are given a lot of leeway, and sometimes have ringer statutes that give them one final out if it looks like they are going to lose control. Just go to any revised code in any state and search of political party or political parties.
Jaspian (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Dear Jim

Primaries have nothing to do with the government... not even the state. The party for that state selects all attributes of its election from the date to how the points are awarded (that's why rules are sometimes different between Dem and Rep primaries in the same State). Also in my state, one must be registered to a party to participate in that party's primary

Thus, constitutionality has no bearing on primaries. This is why someone who lost can still run for President as Independent

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.