Re: Satan Invented Evolution Pt 7: Living Fossils

Part 7 of my rebuttal videos to VenomFangX's 'Satan Invented Evolution' series. This video addresses his fifth video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKa77qb45c4

akg41470's response to the same video I am talking about here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xaRR_cUonE

This video ended a bit abruptly. I suddenly realized my 10mins was up. The points that I didn't address in VFX's video has already been addressed by akgg41470. So why repeat what another man has already said when you can just link him ;)

Apparently, CNN has pulled the dinosaurs article (at least I can't find it anymore). If you want to read the article yourself, just google for it. 'Dinosaur lived with their ancestors'.

In my 'visual representation' I forgot to mention that it represents a timeline. I should have said that so that it's easier to understand it.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• VenomFangX
• fallacy
• Torah
• Creation
• Prayer
• Rabbi
• Sabbath
• Holocaust
• Minora
• Jewish
• Jew

[Goldenmean87]

Man, this video is drivel. You keep reiterating that he "read one sentence" and keep calling his actions stupid etc. Why not make the case for what you think is true? This video seriously sucks balls. If you had a good argument, I could have replied with something to show what you believe to be false, but no such luck. You just keep rambling on in broken english and mocking venomfang rather than showing you are any more intelligent. I don't have time to waste on your other vids, sorry.

[WeiSein]

I am not trying to make an argument for myself in this video. That is not what this video is about. This is a rebuttal video, hence the Re in the title. I was responding to VFX's arguments. And if my rebuttal sounds silly, maybe that is because the original arguments made by VFX were silly in the first place (you would have known if you bothered to watch that video). And if you don't want to waste your time, don't comment in the first place.

[Daghead]

Wow. I do believe in creation, but also have to agree. That was pretty lame of him, and it gets worse in other videos. You did a great job here, and hopefully he will have learned his lesson.

I sortof think I understand where he was going with the article, though. It reinforces the point of the silliness of how evolutionist's facts can change. Even though I would have assumed that species in evolution would have overlapped in time anyway.

[WeiSein]

Thanks for the open mind! Because if you read through the comments to his videos, a lot of other people do agree with him and eat up his dishonesty. And about evolutionist's fact keep changing, I addressed this point a bit in the first part of this video series. Check it out! Hope you are satisfied with my explanation there.

[dustindizzle]

About DNA, meaning your DNA cannot change into a Crickets DNA.all that videos trying to do is say since we are alike,we came from chimps.LOL.Cars are designed alike,why? common design.You interpret things againsted God, I Interpret for God.you think your related to an apple,i think im related to other humans.

[WeiSein]

Did that video say we came from chimp? Human DNA changing into cricket DNA? You are the master of strawmen. It is tiresome and a waste of time talking to someone like you.

[WizardJim]

Creationist: "If you believe you are monkey then you can act like monkeys!"

Non-Retard: "And if you believe you were made out of dirt? Tell you what, you lie down on the ground and shut up, i'll eat a banana and shit on your head, deal?"

[Muaguana]

Lawl.

[Gozer1122]

Within the framework of the human experience, one can behold the phenomenon of the "self-evident miracle". Not really something that most people would call "breathtaking", but the self-evident miracle can be realized by simply appreciating the complexity of the simplest things in nature- such as the texture of a rock or the beauty of a flower. Whether God exists or not, both possibilities are frightening...

[Gozer1122]

Evolution is a fairy tale. It takes alot more faith to believe in it than to believe that a supremely powerful Entity (even if He is not a personal Being) created the finite things that we can see and touch. (1) Matter and temporal energy can be measured, therefore they are not infinite (2) If the universe was created, then That which created it must have powers which transcend the creation, since a cause is greater than its effect (3) It is a logical absurdity that something can create itself

[publicdrunkeness]

5 stars

[SolidSnakeRules]

The things that PCS/VFX says pretty much contradict his view enough. Wei is pointing out the logical fallacies that VFX relies on daily to justify his disbelief in evolution. He doesn't even acknowledge natural selection. He gets most of his crap from Kent Hovind, a man who believes that evolution is a single organism turning into another over the span of its life..They do this to themselves. What opposing party's evidence? What evidence?

[memblor]

win

[Goldenmean87]

I am pretty interested in the theory and will be waiting, but at the same time neither theory explains the origin of the universe. It has been concluded that the universe had a beggining and thus a cause which must transend matter and time and ultimatly a cause of its own. So the idea that somehow either theory lends credit to materialism is invalid.

[stepbackfool]

Perhaps not yet, but string theory is getting closer, wait a few years.

[Goldenmean87]

I do know why they believe in the Big Bang. I agree with the evidence that points toward the universe being more condensed at some point and I agree with the conclusion that the universe had a beggining. However, there is no satisfactory explanation for why matter binds together and why it orbits in circular/eliptical organized patterns as the result of a chaotic explosion.

[stepbackfool]

Read the book "parallel worlds", it's written by a renowned physics professor about the history of cosmology as well as the big bang and string theory. I think that will clarify why scientists believe in the Big Bang.

[Goldenmean87]

[Rebuttal: To counter, disprove or contradict the opposing party's evidence or presumption by introducing new evidence.] That is one of many similar definitions. You did VERY little of this and ALOT of senseless rambling which made you look dumber than the person you are responding too.