Bill Gaede in China: Light Q & A

This is the questions and answers segment of the presentation I gave at the ICPST 2010 in Hong Kong, China, on December 29. The paper, titled "Light: The Rope Hypothesis", has now been published in the Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Physics, Science and Technology. The reference is:

Gaede, Bill, "Light: The Rope Hypothesis," 2010 Conference on Physics, Science and Technology (ICPST 2010), Hong Kong, China, Dec. 28-30, 2010, Ed. Jiang Hui, pp. 63-66, (ISBN 978-1-4244-9124-7, IEEE 2010).

The ICPST 2010 proceedings are published by IEEE and papers will be archived in the IEEE Xplore and Indexed by Ei Compendex and ISI.

IEEE Catalog Number: CFP1098L-DVD
ISBN: 978-1-4244-9124-7

The website is at: http://www.icpst.org

The program Schedule is at:

http://www.icimt.org/IACSIT%20Hong%20Kong%20Program.pdf

The rope model of light and the atom has also been published in:

Gaede, William, "Light: neither particle nor transverse wave", in "What is the Electron?", Ed. V. Simulik, Apeiron (2005).

http://www.amazon.com/What-Electron-Volodimir-Simulik/dp/0973291125

and

Gaede, Bill, "Why God Doesn't Exist," ViNi (2008).

http://www.amazon.com/Why-God-Doesnt-Exist-ebook/dp/B002IPHCME

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Bill Gaede
• Hong Kong
• China
• ICPST 2010
• IEEE 2010
• the rope hypothesis
• linklength
• what is light
• Thread Theory
• c = ƒ λ
• slit experiment
• EPR
• photoelectric effect
• frequency
• wavelength
• EM wave
• electromagnetism
• amplitude
• field
• Quantum Mechanics
• General Relativity
• gravitational lensing

[Aegis5461]

A torsion cannot apply pressure, You avoided answering all of the questions that were asked because you are a quack

[bgaede]

"A torsion cannot apply pressure"

.

Twist a rope and check the pressure on the wall.

[L1ber8ted]

@illumined1 You really need to stop trolling Bill's account. Go learn about the theories first before talking crap; almost everything you say is either explained or you completely miss the point.

[lukeev]

@illumined1 In essence, you're still trolling.

[L1ber8ted]

@bgaede Bill the more I learn about physics, the more I realize that 99% of people on Earth don't understand what they THEMSELVES are talking about; i.e. people don't even understand their OWN definition! :O That's kinda scary and disturbing, no? Some kind of spooky surrealist nightmare.

[bgaede]

"get a degree in something"

Einstein and Hawking got degrees and it didn't do them any good, now did it?

[Aegis5461]

@L1ber8ted The establishment sent a man to the moon... Gaede and his idiotic disciples like you have nothing to show for all the pissing and moaning you do about how the science doesnt make sense. Here's a tip, get a degree in something other than communications or psychology before you start trying to talk about science. You're way out of your league you artsy little prick

[L1ber8ted]

@Aegis5461 Learn how to make a rational argument. I'll give you a clue: that wasn't one. Otherwise, I don't want to know, so go away and learn about wave-packets, or angels. Whatever turns you on.

[Aegis5461]

@L1ber8ted His theory is BS and his idea about what science is is completely irrational... by saying that he need not test or validate his theory he basically is avoiding the cold hard facts of nature... he is a big advocate of proof by intimidation

[bgaede]

4. The purpose of Science is NOT to arrive at the truth simply because truth is an OPINION. What is true to you is a lie to me. In Science, we don't prove theories because proof is in the eye of the beholder. In Science, we explain objectively and the jurors UNDERSTAND. That's where Science ends. What begins thereafter is belief: religion. Persuasion is the military arm of religion. As soon as the scientists attempts to prove to you, he has stealthily switched hats. He is now a priest.

[bgaede]

3. "that are testable"

.

'Testable' is a detestable word in Science. In Science, we don't run experiments or test anything. In Science, we ONLY explain. If you don't like my explanation, you can run as many experiments as you want in your dark basement lab. But when you come back to the conference, your job is to explain. Science ONLY deals with explanations. What YOU did to come up with your theory is extra-scientific.