Actual photos of the human soul? Or part of it? I am very uncertain and baffled over this phenomena.Can someone elaborate on this? Or maybe verify or deny the nature of this sciense? Its a very interesting piece of work about the field that surrounds/fills the body. Anyone out there with knowlegde about this is hereby invited to please give coments.
@AnduinX How is it basless, how does it abandon defining counsciousness? Defining conciousness is done, what they are working on is explaining how it works.
smallfellow 2 days ago
@AnduinX We dont have the exact understanding of it YET. It is coming, they are working on it and getting closer every day.
If you postulate for a soul, you have to explain what it is made of, how it is "implanted" and how it came to be.
smallfellow 2 days ago
@smallfellow: It provides no clear definition of what is conscious and what is not conscious and it doesn’t explain why complexity would give rise to consciousness in what otherwise would be unconscious inanimate matter. By the way, I think your statement is way off base. You don’t need to be a materialist to know that our understanding is limited.
AnduinX 2 days ago
@smallfellow: The logic that led to the conclusion is simple. Since we can’t find a unique correlate for consciousness in the brain, and since consciousness surely must be a product of the brain, it must therefore be an emergent property of the combination of everything. The problem I have with this explanation is that it is baseless, abandons the hard problem of defining consciousness, and creates more problems in the process.
AnduinX 2 days ago
@smallfellow: In decades past neuroscience attempted to define what consciousness was and how the brain produced it. They were looking for a correlate for consciousness, but never succeeded. The idea that consciousness emerges as a result of complexity is without foundation. It’s a position that was taken due to a lack of understanding rather than more understanding. A forced retreat if you will so that materialism could remain tenable.
AnduinX 2 days ago
@AnduinX What hard problems that it can't answer? Logic in essence is biased, because of natural selection and the physical limitations of the brain imposed by just mentionned process. The difference between materialists and spiritualists, is that we understand HOW our understanding of the world is ultimately limited(Though we have not reached our limit yet.) You guys dont.
smallfellow 3 days ago
@GracefulAscension Humans require a soul? SOuls are the energy source sustaining organisms in life? What the hell ar eyou talking about.
smallfellow 3 days ago
at 5:59 it looks almost like an eye. This video is amazing too
XxXxEmoWolfiexXxX 6 days ago
I wish people would seek truth rather than confirmation
journey007 1 week ago
@SparkSpiritBlue- However, i believe the soul is much more than mind, body and emotion...i believe that the spirit world, Especially Heaven, is much more real than the phyisical world.
meandthiscandybar 1 week ago