Fight was not borin acordin2today's standards.rocky would hav hard times beatin baker cuz baker beat almost all shorter fighters with his excelent hoox jabs!bb could easily last ten rnds!facts! Bb was the only logical oponent left4rm. Weil n rm made big mistake not fitin him. It could ve also been good bye fite2fans on live tv radio coast2coast broadcast!
ThIS WAS QUALIFYIN MATCH TO FIND OPONENT FOR RM.THIS PROVES BAKER WAS TRUE HEAVYWEIGHT FOR ANY ERA 188CM 6'2 220lbs 100kgs U CAN FIND MORE BY READIN this SUPER RARE GREAT ARTICLE boxstuf/Bob_Baker_Vs_Rocky_Marciano_2.3.56 !!! It rules chek all fine external linx bookmark print giv2all yo!
BB WAS REAL HEAVY4ANY ERA HE WAS 188CM 6'2 220LBS 100KG U CAN FIND MORE INFO BY SEARCHIN4THIS GREAT INFORMATIVE RARE OrIGINAL SUPER ARTICLE User:Boxstuf/Bob Baker Vs Rocky Marciano 2.3.56 !
THIS HISTORIC BOUT PROVES FIGHT WAS OK NOT BORING. THIS VINDICATES BAKER. ROCKY SHOULD HAV FOUGHT HIM ON FEBRUARY 3 1956 AS HE WAS TOP CONTENDER, REAL HEAVYWEIGHT FOR ANY ERA, TALL, ONLY LOGICAL OPONENT FOR RM!
Baker! got screwed. No matter how he fought he won, this is his 13in a row aka baker's dozen! At biginin of career he won 26. Thus its 39in row, very impresive!
Rocky Marciaon would have destroyed this guy. The guy didnt have great knockout power and couldnt have kept Rocky off of him. Marciano would have steamrolled this pugilist, though he is a good boxer and he fought in a tough era with lots of talent!
@elnick1000 Rocky gave Charles the shot becasue he had been an ex champion. Plus, he needed a buck. I"m sure even Rocky was surpised at the great fight Charles put up. Valdez never got a chance because he was inconsistant and couldnt draw flies. The guy was a bore to watch in the ring. He puts me to sleep!
@ngwrestler When in refering to weight, I was talking about title defenses. After beating Charles, Valdez went on a winning streak. Charles next lost to Harold Johnson, before getting two wins in a row and a title shot. valdez had some five wins in a row before the first Marciano-Charles fight. Certainly he was more deserving of the shot at that time, and was probably at his best at that time. the Rock's camp may have wanted no part of Valdez.
Fight was not borin acordin2today's standards.rocky would hav hard times beatin baker cuz baker beat almost all shorter fighters with his excelent hoox jabs!bb could easily last ten rnds!facts! Bb was the only logical oponent left4rm. Weil n rm made big mistake not fitin him. It could ve also been good bye fite2fans on live tv radio coast2coast broadcast!
Gildyshowss 1 month ago
ThIS WAS QUALIFYIN MATCH TO FIND OPONENT FOR RM.THIS PROVES BAKER WAS TRUE HEAVYWEIGHT FOR ANY ERA 188CM 6'2 220lbs 100kgs U CAN FIND MORE BY READIN this SUPER RARE GREAT ARTICLE boxstuf/Bob_Baker_Vs_Rocky_Marciano_2.3.56 !!! It rules chek all fine external linx bookmark print giv2all yo!
GildyGury 1 month ago
BB WAS REAL HEAVY4ANY ERA HE WAS 188CM 6'2 220LBS 100KG U CAN FIND MORE INFO BY SEARCHIN4THIS GREAT INFORMATIVE RARE OrIGINAL SUPER ARTICLE User:Boxstuf/Bob Baker Vs Rocky Marciano 2.3.56 !
GildyGury 1 month ago
THIS HISTORIC BOUT PROVES FIGHT WAS OK NOT BORING. THIS VINDICATES BAKER. ROCKY SHOULD HAV FOUGHT HIM ON FEBRUARY 3 1956 AS HE WAS TOP CONTENDER, REAL HEAVYWEIGHT FOR ANY ERA, TALL, ONLY LOGICAL OPONENT FOR RM!
GildyGury 2 months ago
Baker! got screwed. No matter how he fought he won, this is his 13in a row aka baker's dozen! At biginin of career he won 26. Thus its 39in row, very impresive!
Gildyshowss 2 months ago
Rocky Marciaon would have destroyed this guy. The guy didnt have great knockout power and couldnt have kept Rocky off of him. Marciano would have steamrolled this pugilist, though he is a good boxer and he fought in a tough era with lots of talent!
ah93704 4 months ago
@elnick1000 Rocky gave Charles the shot becasue he had been an ex champion. Plus, he needed a buck. I"m sure even Rocky was surpised at the great fight Charles put up. Valdez never got a chance because he was inconsistant and couldnt draw flies. The guy was a bore to watch in the ring. He puts me to sleep!
ah93704 4 months ago
@ngwrestler When in refering to weight, I was talking about title defenses. After beating Charles, Valdez went on a winning streak. Charles next lost to Harold Johnson, before getting two wins in a row and a title shot. valdez had some five wins in a row before the first Marciano-Charles fight. Certainly he was more deserving of the shot at that time, and was probably at his best at that time. the Rock's camp may have wanted no part of Valdez.
elnick1000 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Marciano beat much better fighters than Valdes
ngwrestler 5 months ago
Respond to this video...
Marciano definitely would have beaten Valdes. Valdes would have gotten broken down mentally and physically and destroyed.
ngwrestler 5 months ago