Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

4409 -- Judge gets Owned

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
85,590
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 8, 2009

We received a coupon.....errrrrr, I mean bill.....errrr, I mean ticket from officer johnson a month ago. This so called ticket looked like a home depot receipt so we decided to have a little fun at our military tribunal......errrrrr I mean city court.

We knew what we are doing and had this planned before hand just to show you how they will refuse to name a plaintiff.

We get a kick out of punking these actors..... errrrr, i mean judges who knowingly screw people everyday.

We are doing this just to show you they have no real power. Only the power YOU give them.

The judge claims we don't know the law....hahahaha

Remember don't get mad when you go to court it's actually just a game. Your job is to checkmate them and get them to blatently ignore all -- their -- rules.

Remember in the end of the day they are going to do whatever they want because they have goons with guns and a badges to do their dirty work.

We ask the judge who the plaintiff is. He would not answer and threatens us and claims we are being combative? WTF

The real story is the judge is the prosecuter...the state is the plaintiff, and the cop is the witness.

Proof there is no justice. You're basically in a military tribunal and you are there to pay a bill. You are guilty end of story. The trial is all for show just your rigged elections.

The courts and voting are a complete sham. They are only there to give you the illusion that you have a choice. We need to all grow up and realize this.

-- Court information --
Judge Herbert Pierpan
Scottsdale City Court
7500 n 75th st
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
480-312-7975

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • .... the judge owned you...

  • "I can't get a fair trial if you have already told me I'm a violator". Stroke of genius bud.

see all

All Comments (808)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • (@Timb0NZ): I can not believe 9 people side with your stupid comment, are they all your mates or something? I guess you think it is funny that the courts have removed their flags so not to be treasonous, I guess you think it's cool that private courts have removed common law and lawful equity, and I guess you think it's smart to side with a criminal PERSON imposter, acting as a Judge, the point you so stupidly missed, was the judge refused to answer because he is a fraud and imposter

  • Did you appeal? I would refuse to answer questions until the plaintiff was named, then appeal. Under the law you clearly didn't have a fair trial. I would also challenge the juristiction of the court perhaps.

  • I think the quote: "When injustice becomes law resistance becomes duty." pretty much sums up this video.

  • @Texjustice1

    Look into administrative law and you will find that to no be true.

    In Administrative law a governmental agency will claim and exert powers that are supposed to be restricted to the 3 branches. DSHS will be a plaintive, provide the judge, and the prosecutor. Then will claim that the can't rule on the laws and claim that they are ruling on a civil matter.

  • @RP4409

    I wish I had known that while I was stationed in AZ I could have gotten my speeding ticket tossed instead of taking that 'driver safety' class.

    

  • The top comments are by some ridiculously ignorant people. Next time use Ucc1-308 and Ucc1-103. Proceed is to go forward in pro se. You need to be in properia persona. Somehow you contracted with the courts rather if u signed your name or gave them yiur name. TimbONZ you are a fuckin turncoat idiot.

  • Its funny that the Judge will not answer. He is a joke. They can pretty much get away with whatever they want to do just by using fancy terminology and dodging valid questions. I guess that just telling the defendant to do some research is a valid answer. I mean, if the judge was indeed as knowledgable as he thinks he is, then why couldn't he elabourate on why the defendant was incorrect? Why? Because he was full of shit.

  • guilty until prooven innocent,,,,,but you're not allowed to proove it in court,,,,,,,next case please,,,i dont care about rules and guidelines,, this my court and i'll do as i want,,and if you piss me off, i'll have you put in a cage,,,,well i'll be a mother fucker

  • How do we know what body language is without video?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more