Top Comments
All Comments (808)
-
(@Timb0NZ): I can not believe 9 people side with your stupid comment, are they all your mates or something? I guess you think it is funny that the courts have removed their flags so not to be treasonous, I guess you think it's cool that private courts have removed common law and lawful equity, and I guess you think it's smart to side with a criminal PERSON imposter, acting as a Judge, the point you so stupidly missed, was the judge refused to answer because he is a fraud and imposter
-
Did you appeal? I would refuse to answer questions until the plaintiff was named, then appeal. Under the law you clearly didn't have a fair trial. I would also challenge the juristiction of the court perhaps.
-
I think the quote: "When injustice becomes law resistance becomes duty." pretty much sums up this video.
-
Look into administrative law and you will find that to no be true.
In Administrative law a governmental agency will claim and exert powers that are supposed to be restricted to the 3 branches. DSHS will be a plaintive, provide the judge, and the prosecutor. Then will claim that the can't rule on the laws and claim that they are ruling on a civil matter.
-
I wish I had known that while I was stationed in AZ I could have gotten my speeding ticket tossed instead of taking that 'driver safety' class.
-
The top comments are by some ridiculously ignorant people. Next time use Ucc1-308 and Ucc1-103. Proceed is to go forward in pro se. You need to be in properia persona. Somehow you contracted with the courts rather if u signed your name or gave them yiur name. TimbONZ you are a fuckin turncoat idiot.
-
Its funny that the Judge will not answer. He is a joke. They can pretty much get away with whatever they want to do just by using fancy terminology and dodging valid questions. I guess that just telling the defendant to do some research is a valid answer. I mean, if the judge was indeed as knowledgable as he thinks he is, then why couldn't he elabourate on why the defendant was incorrect? Why? Because he was full of shit.
-
guilty until prooven innocent,,,,,but you're not allowed to proove it in court,,,,,,,next case please,,,i dont care about rules and guidelines,, this my court and i'll do as i want,,and if you piss me off, i'll have you put in a cage,,,,well i'll be a mother fucker
-
How do we know what body language is without video?
.... the judge owned you...
Timb0NZ 5 months ago 8
"I can't get a fair trial if you have already told me I'm a violator". Stroke of genius bud.
wesmatron 5 months ago 7