Uncircumcised versus Circumcised Baby Care(ie still has foreskin or lacking foreskin)
Top Comments
All Comments (68)
-
INCORRECT facts here! Very few boys naturally retract by 3 or 4! Actually only 50% of boys naturally retract by 10. The rest are usually naturally retracted by teen yrs, occasionally even later. Again, the boy is the only one who should manually retract, when he instinctively feels and knows to explore this. Not from being told to!
-
@smonroy45 i would have kicked the doctor's ass. seriously.
-
what the fuck? You need to find a new doctor that isn't completely retarded. At that babies age the foreskin is still fused to the glans of the penis. That's straight up like ripping your fingernail of the nail bed.
-
@smonroy45 That is NOT normal. Whatever you do, DO NOT FORCE IT! This can cause infection and even scarring. You really should contact your clinic about the incident. As to whether you should be retracting it, it's not really necessary until he's fully able to do so himself.
-
OMG my pediatrician forced back my baby's foreskin at his last appointment (4 days ago) when I asked him how I was supposed to be cleaning it. I had never pulled back the skin, and my baby started screaming in pain. His doctor put his diaper back on and hurried out of the room and when I checked my son afterwards it was actually bleeding! I showed the nurse that came in and she told me not to worry and to make sure I start pulling back the skin to clean it. What do I do???
-
pity american doctors (nearly all of them) on youtube feel this childish need to hang a device around their necks to suggest some sort of authority. It reminds me of every employee over there, they're all "vice presidents". "Irrtated and raw" he says? It's been damn well mutilated! Americans make me livid and absolutely ill regarding this subject. One video after the other regarding genital mutilation, they ALL come from the US, the home of mass mutilation (after the religious).
-
@lp42884life "Calm down yall. In about 10 years this will be a moot issue and circumcission will be rare."
No without a substantial public protest. Given the strong culture for infant penis sculpting, a ban on male circumcision is in order, just as a 1996 fan on any form of female circumcision, included removal of only clitoral hood or a ceremonial pin-prick, was needed to stop the practice in a tiny fraction of 1% minority.
-
I have raised four adopted son, one circumcised and three intact. Intact care was very simple, like this doctor says. My circumcised son's foreskin stump had all ready stuck back down when we got him. Our doc pulled it loose, which was horrible! I tried to keep it from reattaching, but it just resulted in more pain. I finally decided to leave it alone. It healed and, when he was two, what was left of his foreskin loosened on its own, just like it would have if it had been intact.
-
This is great! There is really no excuse for physicians not knowing that it is wrong to force back the foreskin of a baby or young child. The American Academy of Pediatrics has been very straightforward on that for decades, yet some American physicians still insist on inflicting pain and injury on children this way. Any parent whose physician advises, or performs, any kind of retraction of an infant's foreskin should file a complaint against him/her!
The basic message here is...
If he is intact, you don't have to do anything.
If he is circumcised, you have to take great care to be sure infections and fusion of the wound does not occur.
The solution? Leave him intact!
freedom0f5peech 2 years ago 65
Oh my goodness! I can't BELIEVE how many mothers have told me "You know you're going to have to take special care for it if you don't get him cut!" It didn't make ANY sense to me. After my son is born I thought to myself a lot "Wow, this is messy enough without having to worry about an open wound!" Use logic, people!
rayray695 2 years ago 62