Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Bob Barr Votes Against Hillary

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,060
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 4, 2008

Libertarian Presidential Candidate, Bob Barr, weighs in on Obama choosing Hillary as VP... before he appears on The Colbert Report.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The man I may be voting for in November!

  • Bob Barr is the clear choice of change between two other candidates that have virtually no real differences or new ideas to offer. Bob wants to reduce government, both the Rep and Dem candidates want to increase the size of government. Don't let them fool you with that "Barr can't win" bull crap. Bob is the man!

see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oh god the Obama "Change" lie here we go again

    For christ sake it's good marketing nothing more

  • If a third party won we would be fucked, I voted against Obama, but how are you guys so stupid? Do you believe BOB FREAKIN BARR COULD RUN OUR COUNTRY?

  • Someone may take what you say seriously if you could spell a four letter word correctly. "Bobs a joke"? Let me tell everyone a joke: this one senator who never did anything in the senate, decides that he wants to run the most dangerous nation on earth. Similarly, a parent gave their toddler a 9mm to play with and wondered why they got shot. Please, everyone, RESEARCH the candidates and their stances and pick one that suits YOUR beliefs and not some TV personality's.

  • Barr sucks. government is here to saty whether you like it or not. Bobs a joke!

  • Whatever you think of Barr, he has one thing right: Hillary would be the worst choice for Obama VP. Obama stands for change. Hillary stands for more of the same. She's an old-style Democrat. The way she refused to apologize for her pro-Iraq War vote and her massive contributions from corporations and special interests, clearly demonstrate that. But just in case you're not convinced, remember how Hillary covered up the assassination of attorney Vince Foster by having her staff ransack his office.

  • The first debate will be September 26. If you got a pony in this race, now's the time to place your bets!

    If Bob Barr or any of the other candidates get as much support as Ross Perot did before the debates back in 1992, then there's a chance that they'll get invited to the debates.

    Shrug me off, but screaming New World Order and sulking won't do any good.

    I'm going to get some bumper stickers as soon as I can. We gotta spread the word!

  • At least Barr's taking advantage of free media. Past LP candidates never really did that.

    And Barr has an advantage that Ross Perot never had: the LP won't go away if he's defeated! We're going for long haul, here.

    Local experience is most important. I helped a local LP candidate run a few years ago. He lost (even though he was a likeable guy) not because the big 2 shut him out, but because few people knew him!

    That's what we've got to do. Get involved locally, and get connected!

  • Washington was never a Federalist, though he allied with them.

    There was no Anti-Federalist Party; most of those people against the Federalists joined Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party.

    And Jackson did not create the Democratic Party so much as he wrested control of Jefferson's party; his opponents formed the National Republican party, which later folded into the Whigs.

    So the Dems have always been in the top two. But, like PastorIblis said, all that's irrelevant these days.

  • haha nothing man. I just thought it was sort of contradicting what a pastor is. But I guess it could be a statement

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more