Confronting the Skeptics on Global Warming

In this video, we confront the skeptics who believe that Global Warming is nothing more than a hoax. It's time to face reality and realize that no matter what these 'skeptics' claim, the planet is in crisis and we all need to do our part to making it become a hospitable place for future generations to come.

http://www.news-on-global-warming.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• global
• warming
• environment
• pollution
• al
• gore
• inconvenient
• truth
• climate
• change
• bio
• fuel
• alternate
• energy

[shadowbillyphone]

I have currently just finished doing an environmental study for my project on GW as unbiased as possible. Us humans plays a huge part for GW but as most would say, it is also a cycle. Just that us humans are speeding it up. We can speed it up by simply farting. I think most people don't really notice why we care about GW now compared to 30 years ago is because us humans have had a taste of our desire and wants to keep the desire. We want to drive cars, heaters on during winter and much more.

[cupera1]

Global warming has been going on since the end of the little ice age ~200 years ago and will continue or start cooling even if every human was taken of the planet tomorrow. The argument over man made GW is like to fleas fighting over who steer the dog they are ridding on.

[ICECOLD1972]

Without Fox News, The Truth would not be out there. Thats why the Libs want to shut, Fox New, Rush, Hannity, Levin and all the other truth speakers down.

[Meurglys33]

Of all the papers, 75% fell into the first three categories, either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view; 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change. Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position.

Do you want to clarify your "Confirmed! Global warming is 'settled' as a scam" assertion now?

[Meurglys33]

@Niightversionn "Confirmed! Global warming is 'settled' as a scam"

Keep telling you that. I can't wait to read your paper in scientific literature. Or try to google "naomi oreskes global warming" and hit "I'm feeling lucky". Then you'll be able to read this: The 928 papers were divided into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position.

(to be continued...)

[Meurglys33]

@ronny4ever123 "how are you so sure these people are paid by oil companies?"

If you want sources on this, message me.

"most climatoligists disagree that the warming is caused by human emitions."

Quite the contrary. Try to google "isotopic signature of atmospheric carbon".

The rest of your argument falls into the "tinfoil hat" category, so I'm not going to address it.

[Meurglys33]

I have an opinion (I know, opinions... those worthless things...) concerning the phrasing. I happen to study global warming, for the record.

First, you need more than a brain to understand what's up, you also happen to need information. Insulting people from the get-go is hardly a good way to convey information.

Second, obviously, we don't "all know that global warming is real", otherwise videos like this would be irrelevant.

So, basically, I'm not sure about the method employed here.

[ronny4ever123]

how are you so sure these people are paid by oil companies? most climatoligists disagree that the warming is caused by human emitions. the government just wants more control from people like you so they create this scam called "climate change". Its not human caused and its not as scary is they make it seem. any one with a brain can see that this is truly a lie.

[Finlandcitizen]

@GoneTemple

?? Naive people will give out their money for a useless cause and THEN rape and ravage the planet becouse they did not lissen to science.

[GoneTemple]

@Finlandcitizen naive people will rape and ravage the planet and kill us all... so sad