Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Planet X Found on MS World Wide Telescope? CW LEONIS -- Why it may not be what is claimed.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
37,178
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 14, 2008

CW LEONIS -- Why it may not be what is claimed.

http://endgametime.wordpress.com/cw-leonis-why-it-may-not-be-what-is-claimed/

....Light redshift has been used to determine distance to cosmic objects that are very far away. Quasars have the most redshift of all cosmic objects indicating they are billions of lightyears (LY) away.

However, recently Nasa discovered a quasar that has a redshift indicating a distance of 10 billion LY from Earth. It appears adjacent to a much closer galaxy that is only about a 100 million LY away. Then they found another and another, Some appear closer, some farther. New technology revealed that the quasars are connected to the closer galaxy by electromagnetic (EM) plasma indicating that the quasar and galaxy are actually neighbors and that redshift is unreliable for estimating distance. This just destroyed Astronomy, but no one is accepting it. People who work their whole lives have a hard time accepting new facts that contradict their beliefs. Ask a religious fanatic.

This paper explains the controversy.

http://www.livingcosmos.com/quasar.htm

http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf034/sf034p08.htm

http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v11/i3/quasar.asp

Consider the distance reported for CW Leonis (600 LY) could be off by a factor up to a 1,000+. Remember CW Leonis is thought to be a red giant that is the brightest object in the sky in infrared. The infrared image may be caused by the same type of EM that may cause redshift errors with quasars. A factor of six orders of magnitude would put CW Leonis about 0.0006 LY or 367 AUs or 3.9E9 miles away when the photo was taken. A factor of 6E6 places CW Leonis about where Nasa says Elenin is when the infrared photo was taken.

....CW Leonis is reported to be moving directly toward us at high speed. Therefore, its location in the sky should stay relatively the same until its approach is close enough to be detected by movement of the Earth around the sun. It was discovered in 1969 and its heading directly toward us. I can't find any recent location data on this. Can you?

In an expanding universe, I would expect a red giant to be moving away from us like everything else and not directly at us. Objects in space flying straight at us may be flying at us because of gravitational attraction. Therefore, I conclude that the infrared image in googlesky could be Elenin/Nibiru heading for a sling shot around the sun and the infrared signature is caused by the objects extreme EM field. The EM field causes additional redshift proportional to the EM field strength.

We can choose to believe those that continue to rely on methods that are proven to be flawed, or we can start over fresh with new ideas that make logical sense. Staying the present course and denying the facts because of political correctness is absolutely crazy and is turning science into a religion. Do we really need another one? We already have the new religion of "Man-made Global Warming."

There isn't a current replacement for redshift calculations that I know of, so everybody turns their nose up at the current discovery by saying quasars are the only cosmic body known to be affected by this discovery with no other explanation. I say take another look. They are pushing their blunder under the rug and ignoring it so that they can all continue to get a paycheck; and not have to admit to themselves the embarrassing mistake, thereby, preserving their ego and avoiding ridicule, and most importantly, to hide the truth and consequences.

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (WATCHER71B)

  • i swear its like a diesease to say fake

  • Not a disease at all, just back up what your saying. Make your point without abuse or bad language.

  • Part 3 Of a 3 Part Comment

    It makes sense that the MASS (as proved by an x-ray that there is a mass at that point) is detectable before the heat signature. Definatly an interesting find, I will have to monitor it for a while to come and see what comes of it! Oh and when I used the finder scope there was no known information about this x-ray reading!!!

  • Precisely....it is unknown at this time....(officially)

    Oh and parts 1 and 2 of your comments did not come through for some reason, happens to me all the time. Repost your comments as I think you have something to say. :)

see all

All Comments (151)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I heard that Niburu is G1.9 is that true?

  • So every brown dwarf we find in the night sky is going to be planet X huh? You can't possibly believe there's only one out there. We won't know if it's our special X or just some distant X if we don't know if it's in our solar system or not.

  • Nibiru Oct. 28th here?

  • @DreamTraveller1 next time read before you post. The video IS identified as CW Leonis smart guy.

  • Thanks Watcher! Great evidence,preserve it....

  • What are current updates?

  • FOR people who think its not out there go to yahoo type in 9th planet found. ITS THERE

  • CW Leonis.

    This has to be the twentieth time I've seen this blatant misidentification.

  • This is CW Leonis.

    A carbon star in the Leo constellation 600 lightyears away.

    This is about the fifteenth time I've seen this object misidentified as something else.

  • @Sylux9501 that is most likely a star.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more