Upload

This video is unavailable.

60 - Numberphile

numberphile numberphile·151 videos
480,513

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
183,770
Like     Dislike 18

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like numberphile's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike numberphile's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add numberphile's video to your playlist.

Published on May 18, 2012

The ancient Babylonians used a number system with base 60 (sexagesimal). Tablet image courtesy of Bill Casselman and Yale Babylonian Collection - more at http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cass/Euclid/y...

This video features Thomas Woolley - he tweets at https://twitter.com/#!/thomasewoolley

Website: http://www.numberphile.com/
Numberphile on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/numberphile
Numberphile tweets: https://twitter.com/numberphile

Videos by Brady Haran

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • TheDiggster13

    I actually thought he was going to say 'because the babylonians had 60 fingers' when he was talking about why they used 60.

    · 49

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheDiggster13's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheDiggster13's comment.
  • elistonium

    64 divides really well with 2 and powers of 2 but little else.

    · 25

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate elistonium's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate elistonium's comment.
    in reply to viila5 (Show the comment)

Video Responses


All Comments (475)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • GaryHurd

    Babylonian, and Hebrew numerology held the number seven signified "completion." This magic number has obvious astronomical associations as it is the number of visible "planets," remembering that the ancients thought that the sun and moon were planets circling the Earth.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GaryHurd's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GaryHurd's comment.
    in reply to GaryHurd (Show the comment)
  • GaryHurd

    A circle divided in half (with a "count" of 360 degrees) gives straight 180 degree lines, and in quarters a right angle of 90 degrees. The application to piling up mud bricks, and laying lines for the first cities are obvious. They also had a 10 day market calendar, and you can imagine the interesting combinations. We owe the mathematics of trigonometry to the Sumerians and their circle obsession.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GaryHurd's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GaryHurd's comment.
    in reply to GaryHurd (Show the comment)
  • GaryHurd

    Actually, the place to start is Sumerian astrology. Their cosmology believed the circle was the "perfect shape," that the earth was a circle (disk), and the planets traveled circles. They observed the ~365 days of a year. Since 365 lacks symmetry it can't be "perfect." 360 has periods of 60, and 90. The Sumerian idea that a temple Holy Day didn't "count" as a day was the answer. The obvious Holy Days (the equinox, and solstice days, + one or two more) made the "real" 360 day year work.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GaryHurd's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GaryHurd's comment.
  • TheJayman213

    so sexagonesimal would be even more handy than dozenal if it weren't for the drawback of needing 60 different symbols.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheJayman213's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheJayman213's comment.
  • Xolroc Lowell

    One way to say it would be that they used a combination of base 5 and base 10, but the simplest description is that they weren't using a number system that can be considered as having a base.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Xolroc Lowell's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Xolroc Lowell's comment.
    in reply to Vriska Serket (Show the comment)
  • Malcolm Pagett

    This channel has such a mad on for brown paper. I don't blame then, it's awesome.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Malcolm Pagett's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Malcolm Pagett's comment.
  • Honopena

    they have done it already >:p

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Honopena's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Honopena's comment.
    in reply to imsoren12321 (Show the comment)
  • Vriska Serket

    That's true. Maybe the Babylonians have a special symbol for 60 so we consider it to be a base 60?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vriska Serket's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vriska Serket's comment.
    in reply to gregg4 (Show the comment)
  • gregg4

    No, to write 50 they would just write L.

    Since the value of the number was based on the letter used rather than position, they were not using any particular base.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gregg4's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gregg4's comment.
    in reply to Vriska Serket (Show the comment)
  • Vriska Serket

    The romans to make 7 would write out 1 set of 5 and 2 sets of 1. Were they using base 5?

    ...

    Actually, I have no idea. I'm going to google that.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vriska Serket's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vriska Serket's comment.
    in reply to gregg4 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later