Forget 3-D. Try 1-D!

Buoyed by the success of 3-D movies, studios are considering a new production gimmick to attract audiences: re-issuing films in 1-D. Here's a sneak preview.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Slate
• Slate V
• Avatar
• 3-D
• 1-D
• movies
• animation

[McJaews]

even the first one is 2d. 1d is impossible to depict.

[thenashus4]

who cares if it's not '1-D' it wouldn't have been as funny if they said '2-D'

[Coastergeekperson04]

@madmax41094 4D is time. Time is motion. 4D is motion. I am tired of idiots who say "no ur an idiot 4d is time not moving u fuckin idiot" when they don't even know what they hell they are talking about.

[madmax41094]

Fun fact: We exist in four dimensions, not three dimensions.

Also, 1D is very possible to depict. It's a straight line that connects two points that lie on the same plane. If you've been through elementary school you would have done this plenty of times.

[Randomguy578]

this is 2d were not that non-smart

[someman7]

@PznRen and the dashed line, but yeah. this is 2d

[martinsre11]

@aaabatry 1D would only have length OR width... it ain't depictable

[zwete]

Well, the story of most Hollywood films is already in one dimension.

[DragonMagi]

This video made my inner science geek rage.

[poyp777]

everything is in 3D because we exist in the third dimension therefore everything in our universe has 3 dimensions

[aaabatry]

thats actually 2D.. 1D would be just ONE straight line