every magician has their own goal, and i was just speaking in general terms for the person i replied to. its true that part of a magician's goal is to create an illusion of impossibility, but that doesn't eliminate the need to "fool" the spectator either. I didn't intend to go into detail about this because the person i was responding to was just misunderstanding the person who replied to him. besides, i'm sure Ineski has achieved in creating an illusion of impossibility.
@RawrBell No, its not, its the magicians goal to create an illusion of impossability, if you use one method and people tell you they think you used a different method you've fooled them, but you failed to create an illusion of impossability, its not enough for the spectators to not know how it was done, they have to know it cannot be done.
if it was setup,I don't think he would do it like that ;) he would just have her stop somewehere,and bam - the card is there.without the indicator card,also the queen is surely not the prefered "indicator", since you must explain that queen means 12 ,which is kind of akward.
so I have no idea how he did that,but I m sure there is a method to the madness =)
ah haha is it possible to tell me the setup for this trick?it's driving me crazy:s
xrexer 5 months ago
Affected by Dani =D Great Job!
maxitu21 6 months ago
Seems to me that this trick has multiple outs.
MagicMaddy 7 months ago
You're better than a lot of professionals. Congrats.
P.S. Wait a sec, you're probably a professional yourself by now. ^___^
Wis76 7 months ago
Its real, I figured out for the third time, but very strong trick
magicianhun 7 months ago
@TheBradTobin
every magician has their own goal, and i was just speaking in general terms for the person i replied to. its true that part of a magician's goal is to create an illusion of impossibility, but that doesn't eliminate the need to "fool" the spectator either. I didn't intend to go into detail about this because the person i was responding to was just misunderstanding the person who replied to him. besides, i'm sure Ineski has achieved in creating an illusion of impossibility.
RawrBell 7 months ago
@RawrBell No, its not, its the magicians goal to create an illusion of impossability, if you use one method and people tell you they think you used a different method you've fooled them, but you failed to create an illusion of impossability, its not enough for the spectators to not know how it was done, they have to know it cannot be done.
TheBradTobin 7 months ago
@schwarzeneggermagic
truth is we'll never know ^^
Gnarlycardz 7 months ago
if it was setup,I don't think he would do it like that ;) he would just have her stop somewehere,and bam - the card is there.without the indicator card,also the queen is surely not the prefered "indicator", since you must explain that queen means 12 ,which is kind of akward.
so I have no idea how he did that,but I m sure there is a method to the madness =)
Matzes 7 months ago
@RawrBell haha ya ur right
schwarzeneggermagic 7 months ago