For as big and mean the CPC makes a small, 1.0L, inline-four sound, why not use that technology on say a 2.0L for a sports car or somehting? I know theyve designed automotive engines in the past. It would definatly turn some heads when they hear the exhaust.
looks alot like a rotax 122 crank
pman780 3 months ago
@1337ASM They don't rev as high.
The problem is there is only 1 stationary gear. Rotary engines could rev higher with 2, but that would complicate the construction.
750cc 5 cylinder 150hp (67mm bore X 42.5mm stroke X 5 cylinders :)
1500cc 3 cylinder 300hp (110mm bore X 52.5mm stroke X 3 cylinder) Perfect insanity.
SparkDischarge 4 months ago
@SparkDischarge why not go rotary ? =]
1337ASM 4 months ago
@CadetLD Because they do not rev as high as motorcycles do.
Because they can add more cylinders.
SparkDischarge 6 months ago
@Ranger0n20s No. There is a reason MB used 5 cylinder diesels.
There is never more than 1 piston/connecting rod assembly stopped at any one time.
SparkDischarge 6 months ago
Why didn't they just use a 5 cylinder?
SparkDischarge 6 months ago
For as big and mean the CPC makes a small, 1.0L, inline-four sound, why not use that technology on say a 2.0L for a sports car or somehting? I know theyve designed automotive engines in the past. It would definatly turn some heads when they hear the exhaust.
CadetLD 7 months ago
I have an 08 R1; I prefer the sound of that to the CPC version.
duckgeezer 7 months ago
i want a yamahar too
SovietSlayer 11 months ago
6:12 "You actually got an inline four that thinks it's a v-four"
Having a v-four myself I can say; That's pretty awesome!
(RC36II / VFR750)
Gisae 1 year ago