Top 10 WWII Battleships and Battlecruisers

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
192,510
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 24, 2009

A list of top 10 WWII Battleships and battlecruisers:Yamato,Iowa,Bismarck and many others.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,061)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What's the name of the music o atleast where'd it come from?

  • @m4mihulja so let me get this straight hood which was designed during ww1 and completed as a battlecruiser , in ww2 it comes a bb because you think a modern battleship is no different than a ww1 battlecruiser????????? for the last time also the hood did not have the same armour protection of a battleship thats why she was a fucken battlecrusier, she was heavy because of the size of ther engines. Modern bb engines got alot lighter and more powerfull.

  • @m4mihulja like i have told you countless times Kongo had massive redevelopment during 27-40 and was brought up to battleship standard and reclassed. You agreed with me Hood was bc in ww1 yes? some bc were heavier than bb's and i told you why, the weight of the engines needed to get to the required speed, well just because battleship tech gets better and are able to steam the same speed as bc doesn't suddenly make Hood a bb, in the end Hood in ww2 was just an old battlcruiser.

  • @uchimix Fusu instead of Nagato or the NC SD and even the old Rod/Nelson is a very strange choice.

  • @m4mihulja I am engaged in a traditional Brit pass time called "taking the piss"But back to more serious matters,believe it or not you and I can probably agree on something if the Brit definition of a BC is used then the Alaska is a BC as it was designed to hunt down a class of IJN cruisers that were never built.The USN called them large cruisers though.

  • @m4mihulja You can take a horse to water but can not make it drink.

  • @m4mihulja Renown in particular has not remotely the armour of a WW2 era BB as built it was a tin clad even by WW1 standards.A WW2 era RN fast BB had decks up to 150mm belt 380mm this was almost 7m deep.Renowns belt was only 225mm thick.

  • @pramboy09 These were BB's in WWII:

    Hood - 8x 380mm, 20-350mm, 30kt

    Kongo - 8x 350mm, 50-350mm, 30kt

    Renown - 6x 380mm, 50-350mm, 30kt

    ALL of those were BATTLESHIPS in WWII, due to having SAME armament, armor, speed and weight like a BB.

  • @pramboy09 Looks like you don't understand this even a little.

    Hood couldn't be a BC in time of WWII, because the development of ship's in WWII grew rapidly, and tactics of naval warfare along with it.

    Ships became longer and heavier with stronger armament and armor.

    This has absolutely nothing to do with upgrades and modifications, this has to do with advance of naval warfare and ships between WWI and WWII.

  • Where is 16inClassBBs?SD&NC&Nagato?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more