Hi all, I'm here to ask your help. I don't really understand the last question + the answer, mainly because my English isn't good enough and I can't fully understand the words they're saying. So would anyone plz be so kind to explain the last question + answer to me. I would be really thankful...
Do scientists and academics who protest the global warming thing receive new funds or do they face troubles and censorshipe for not following the flow?
No, scientific research to question global warming gets one blacklisted, unfunded, and/or attacked by green groups. Hardly scientific behaviour. Science functions from always trying to prove AND disprove a theory.
A bit harder today than 20 years ago hovewer (teh internets).
Would ice-age Earth feed the current population better or worst than today? No.
Are (most) the global warming predictions based around pre-conceived ideas ("prejudice") eg warmer climate HAS to be worst? Yep.
Does politicians and media figures support the global warming hysteria? Yep. Would they do so for free, for Great Justice, in the belief that the world is threatened? No.
Did we grow corn, wheat, rice, etc, in the last ice age?
I do acknowledge you make a good point, that I did not see before now. But unless you can give me facts, such as links or what not, I can't take the whole "new world order" shit seriously.
Because that's what this sounds like, when you say "dependency of the third-world countries on the west".
I doubt the west want's to be dependant on the third-world. It doesn't produce anything that we need, apart from diamonds. Else it'd be an I-land
Food production would be changed but that doesn´t mean it would go down, generally it would go upp.
When looking at the last ice age, one sees that tropical regions, where most of the population is today, was drier.
It is global cooling that would cause fall of food production, global warming does the opposite and that is why the system depict it as such a disaster. Because it would reduce the dependency of the third-world countries on the "west".
My information is current, and wasn't used with an agenda. It was used to explain ocean acidification, its current effects, and theorized future effects. D<
That, and I've seen the effects myself on the various research projects that I have worked on.
Let us accept it ..that this world cannot go back to its green stone age. And if oil rich countries had the power to supply highly poisonous fossil fuels to the world...It is but an act of humane vitae,responsive by accountability, to start giving the world fuel this world needs.. at least a fuel next to edible compound.
on fossil fuels by-products that we using everyday,I do not believed that we are short of knowhow on scientific ways & means,of further refining this by products to the extend of detoxification, refining further from its poisonous contaminants,that the world had already paid it by consuming its emissions on a state of apathy. Proof of it is the derivatives of isotrophil clean alcohol,wonder which is haram,Our daily gasoline full of metal contaminants or
Hi all, I'm here to ask your help. I don't really understand the last question + the answer, mainly because my English isn't good enough and I can't fully understand the words they're saying. So would anyone plz be so kind to explain the last question + answer to me. I would be really thankful...
GwWhiteOxygen 2 years ago
Do scientists and academics who protest the global warming thing receive new funds or do they face troubles and censorshipe for not following the flow?
No, scientific research to question global warming gets one blacklisted, unfunded, and/or attacked by green groups. Hardly scientific behaviour. Science functions from always trying to prove AND disprove a theory.
A bit harder today than 20 years ago hovewer (teh internets).
Fridaey13txhOktober 2 years ago
Would ice-age Earth feed the current population better or worst than today? No.
Are (most) the global warming predictions based around pre-conceived ideas ("prejudice") eg warmer climate HAS to be worst? Yep.
Does politicians and media figures support the global warming hysteria? Yep. Would they do so for free, for Great Justice, in the belief that the world is threatened? No.
Fridaey13txhOktober 2 years ago
Did we grow corn, wheat, rice, etc, in the last ice age?
I do acknowledge you make a good point, that I did not see before now. But unless you can give me facts, such as links or what not, I can't take the whole "new world order" shit seriously.
Because that's what this sounds like, when you say "dependency of the third-world countries on the west".
I doubt the west want's to be dependant on the third-world. It doesn't produce anything that we need, apart from diamonds. Else it'd be an I-land
VerifyVolatile 2 years ago
Food production would be changed but that doesn´t mean it would go down, generally it would go upp.
When looking at the last ice age, one sees that tropical regions, where most of the population is today, was drier.
It is global cooling that would cause fall of food production, global warming does the opposite and that is why the system depict it as such a disaster. Because it would reduce the dependency of the third-world countries on the "west".
Fridaey13txhOktober 2 years ago
You don't know what the sky is? Do you live under a fucking rock?
VerifyVolatile 2 years ago
Please do explain What is SKY? lol what a joke
ponder2006 2 years ago
My information is current, and wasn't used with an agenda. It was used to explain ocean acidification, its current effects, and theorized future effects. D<
That, and I've seen the effects myself on the various research projects that I have worked on.
Byne9 2 years ago
Let us accept it ..that this world cannot go back to its green stone age. And if oil rich countries had the power to supply highly poisonous fossil fuels to the world...It is but an act of humane vitae,responsive by accountability, to start giving the world fuel this world needs.. at least a fuel next to edible compound.
icrowndk 2 years ago
on fossil fuels by-products that we using everyday,I do not believed that we are short of knowhow on scientific ways & means,of further refining this by products to the extend of detoxification, refining further from its poisonous contaminants,that the world had already paid it by consuming its emissions on a state of apathy. Proof of it is the derivatives of isotrophil clean alcohol,wonder which is haram,Our daily gasoline full of metal contaminants or
this clean alcohol cause quran say it.
icrowndk 2 years ago