My Response to "I hate Ron Paul" By James

I took the time to respond to James and help him (hopefully) obtain a wider frame of reference for statements regarding Ron Paul. The video I'm responding to can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0tpGy_fx1U

Check out http://thelibertyminute.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• RonPaul
• TheLibertyMinute
• freedom
• tyranny
• liberty
• economics
• The Fed
• Federal Reserve
• housing crisis
• history
• economy collapse dollar

[wotmot223]

I apologize, I meant to say I feel his economic views have never been succesfully tried. It favors unrestrained wealth. He is well informed on economics (just supports an untested economic model which assumes only those who are healty and wealthy are great). As for his being informed on history... err... not particularly.

[TheLibertyMinute]

@wotmot223 You might try doing some statistical research about what has happened to black families since the implementation og heavy social welfare under LBJ's Great Society... it is staggeringly disappointing and provides an insight about whether welfare does any good or not.

Still, Paul's primary position is about the elimination of corporate welfare through a destruction of the corporatocracy... Where Wall Street and big business keep getting our tax dollars through lobbying.

[revelthehunter]

It's nice to see some Ron Paul supporters trying to sway opinion through facts rather than spamming every political video with his name or calling nonsupporters retarded. I'm happy so many people are supporting him online, but no one will ever sway anyone to any side by being hostile

[TheLibertyMinute]

@revelthehunter I agree about the hostility. I have chastised fellow supporters for being jackasses in comments to others. If they do not know enough to make counter arguments without resorting to ad hominem attacks, then they should spend more time studying Dr. Paul's message, it's foundation and learning how to articulate it instead of showing themselves to be asses on youtube.

[BlackHoleFileOrg]

you are awesome. <<period

[TheLibertyMinute]

@BlackHoleFileOrg Thanks! I've just grown tired of the spread of misinformation through half-truths, sound bytes and the normalcy bias. Too many times people disregard reason and logic to champion whatever the media tells them to without putting forth any examination of the position themselves. It is pathetic, sickening and more than deserving of scorn. I just hope that anything I say to these folks makes them reconsider their "facts" and causes THOUGHT. How refreshing would that be?!?

[nutsarefancy]

If everybody knew more about Ron Paul everybody would vote for Ron Paul.... except for idiots!

[innulja]

don't bother talking to those idiots! But great video!

[PowerfulFellow]

Voting for Ron Paul!

[wotmot223]

I do not support Ron Paul, I honestly feel that his economic views (which is to say the austrian economic model). I must say I find your argument is a strawman when you speak of "cradle to grave" welfare programs. Few programs give him to any but the disabled, very poor or the elderly. I am all for changes to these programs, reductions to them, but elimination? No, not going back to the gilded age. I agree with Paul on reducing the use of our military. But not his economic-polictical views.

[TheNova1960]

Loved your vid I have subbed and sent invite! Good to see someone who is willing to explain to these "haters" that just don't get it! Maybe now they will...cheers!

[cheevo19]

Its pretty funny how its nothing but "dislikes" on james' video and nothing but "likes" on your video. Its really sad how people attempt to slander or villainize someone or something they know little or even nothing about. I remember when freedom of speech was exclusively an American right. James should understand that Ron Paul is actually protecting our rights as American citizens.

[t3rd]

the only two people who dislike this is James and his mother

[thekidofva]

not saying your wrong but can i get some proof that we subsidize the UK's military. (could be useful later)