@Epicvideos333 But alot of eye witness said that they saw it hit the high angle, im not taking this "guy who must prove everyone wrong"s word over people who were i dont know actually there. Im not saying your wrong but after the lights went out the only people who saw what was going on were those still on and all of those people died. So no offense but nobody is really going to know.
@SuperPH34R ok, his theory may be true becuase i really dont think titanic hit that level of angle. that is just too steep. now i dont know the truth, and you may not know the truth, but this is what i think happed (and him) and im not saying that your wrong.
like really, titanic hitting that angle, could be all a lie.
@Epicvideos333 No that is what im trying to say, if this guys theory is true than the decks would be pushed inward and in different directions. Im saying that the gravity, impact, pressure ect.. that is why the decks and front of the bow are bent downward. Now back to the explenation for the bows back, they are pushed outward and downward, the complete opposite of what this guy is saying, thus the shallow angle theory is bullshit.
@SuperPH34R You do know that gravity has effect on everything, right?
not trying to be smart here but you gotta think about the ship hitting the sea floor at a high speed, witch in theory, made the top deaks crush downward.
Wait, if the shallow angle breakup theory is true, than the decks would be mangled upward, and the truth is titanics bent state is a result of the impact and pressure. Just sayin
@Sarasdad91 That's right. The bow end of the ship was full of water while the stern was still holding onto it's air. The water that was inside the ship was so heavy, it was too heavy for it to go down in one piece. When the ship did break, it tore off most of the structure while above water and the stern fell back into the ocean. Then with the bow still sinking, it then pulled the stern to an even keil and broke off under water.
The RMS Queen Mary was built even better than the Titanic and I don't think even she could withstand the pressure of that much water. Don't forget, it wasn't just the water itself that caused the separation of the Titanic bow and stern sections, it was the pressure of the stern rising without the support of the ocean water below it combined with the water inside of the ship that made it snap like a twig., That is like double jeopardy.
@SuperPH34R Exactly. lol auguring is getting kinda dumb on you tube.
Epicvideos333 1 week ago
@Epicvideos333 But alot of eye witness said that they saw it hit the high angle, im not taking this "guy who must prove everyone wrong"s word over people who were i dont know actually there. Im not saying your wrong but after the lights went out the only people who saw what was going on were those still on and all of those people died. So no offense but nobody is really going to know.
SuperPH34R 1 week ago
how come you have to take off 'Final Moments' and ' Missing Pieces' ?
smartesusieq 1 week ago
@SuperPH34R ok, his theory may be true becuase i really dont think titanic hit that level of angle. that is just too steep. now i dont know the truth, and you may not know the truth, but this is what i think happed (and him) and im not saying that your wrong.
like really, titanic hitting that angle, could be all a lie.
Just sayin :)
Epicvideos333 1 week ago
@Epicvideos333 No that is what im trying to say, if this guys theory is true than the decks would be pushed inward and in different directions. Im saying that the gravity, impact, pressure ect.. that is why the decks and front of the bow are bent downward. Now back to the explenation for the bows back, they are pushed outward and downward, the complete opposite of what this guy is saying, thus the shallow angle theory is bullshit.
BTW you should read better before typing. :)
SuperPH34R 1 week ago
@SuperPH34R You do know that gravity has effect on everything, right?
not trying to be smart here but you gotta think about the ship hitting the sea floor at a high speed, witch in theory, made the top deaks crush downward.
Think before type.
Epicvideos333 1 week ago
Wait, if the shallow angle breakup theory is true, than the decks would be mangled upward, and the truth is titanics bent state is a result of the impact and pressure. Just sayin
SuperPH34R 4 weeks ago
@Sarasdad91 That's right. The bow end of the ship was full of water while the stern was still holding onto it's air. The water that was inside the ship was so heavy, it was too heavy for it to go down in one piece. When the ship did break, it tore off most of the structure while above water and the stern fell back into the ocean. Then with the bow still sinking, it then pulled the stern to an even keil and broke off under water.
Streetcar1743 4 weeks ago
The RMS Queen Mary was built even better than the Titanic and I don't think even she could withstand the pressure of that much water. Don't forget, it wasn't just the water itself that caused the separation of the Titanic bow and stern sections, it was the pressure of the stern rising without the support of the ocean water below it combined with the water inside of the ship that made it snap like a twig., That is like double jeopardy.
Sarasdad91 1 month ago
Finnish I love this language!! Cheers from Brazil :)
felipetotora 1 month ago