Prop 103: Colorado's Job Killing Tax Increase
Top Comments
All Comments (11)
-
Awesome visional ad. Did the bill pay. I think even is a person is for 103, they may still like this video.
-
@royalorleanshk Thug Teachers Unions
-
I voted no on 103. I don't want my taxes to increase so I can pay for someone else's kids. End the dept of eduction. Private institutions could charge parents $2500 a year x 20 students per class. $10k of it can go to the admin costs, and the rest to the teacher. You choose your school and teacher!
-
@royalorleanshk The proponent, Rollie Heath, a state senator from Boulder, raised the idea informally in
the Senate, but did not receive sufficient support. No proposal was offered in the House of Representatives, which holds a slim Republican majority. The backers of the measure collected about 16,000
signatures from volunteer gatherers, and expended $151,000 to paid petition gatherers to obtain another
127,000 signatures from registered voters.
-
That was a great show of talent with the dominos, but you should spend your time explaining "how" the jobs will be lost. No backbone, no facts, but a great use of the mousetrap of fear for your campaign!
-
bravo, Caldara!...that is the BEST!
-
VoteLibertarian makes good suggestions, but sometimes some people just need visuals.....
-
Boulder Senator Rollie Heath. He says it's "for the kids."
who in colorado would want to raise taxes right now? who's idea was this prop 103?!
royalorleanshk 4 months ago 4
That was fun but putting out yard signs, passing out fliers, writing letters to the editor and debating Mr. Heath might have a greater impact. You can email letters to the editor of the Denver Post at their openforum address.
VoteLibertarian 4 months ago 3