Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nuts and Bolts - Part 11 (Final)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
408 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 6, 2008

Conclusion

Enacting the National Initiative for Democracy

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (235)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL! That is Xominverse lol!

  • OK, it's interesting to talk about the variety of labels and the related philosophies and tactics, but I am personally very hesistant about the use of labels, especially when some people use it as a form of mind control.

  • For instance, when people talk about "a democracy" as a noun with static connotations, their existing prejudices often interfere with a meaningful analysis of the process. I think the same thing occurs when some people talk about anarchy.

  • *"dynamic rather than static" may be better wording

  • heh, I just don't want to sound like this:

    "Post-Objectivist market anarchist and agorist. And maybe Aristotelian liberal."

    I think of terms in an active rather static sense, so I don't often feel a strong desire to pin myself down to a label where there is an existing prejudice of rigid connotations. My political views are always evolving and I try to remain flexible as I learn. I prefer to think of anarchy in the sense that it is a challenge to illegitimate authority.

  • *label anarchist

  • Btw, if you hate the labe anarchists many people call themselves voluntarists.

  • Well all anarchism is, is autonomy for the indiviual. After that you could support communism. direct democracy, Republicanism, facism, theocracy, no system etc. You just do not wish to force it unto others. The state is artificial. Take care.

  • shhh, that's a secret ;)

    I hope for a day when no one would feel the need to call themselves an anarchist and the use of vague artificial terms like "the state" would become archaic.

    If things move in a positive direction, I think the anarchists of tomorrow will be different from the anarchists of today--that they will have fewer constraints in their thinking and will be more proactive than reactive. Eventually, I hope they will disappear in such a way that anarchy would free itself.

  • Welcome to anarchy. Now we can discuss the best policies that we think humans should pursue.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more