Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

People of African descent in Iraq and India ect. assumed to come as slaves

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,372
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2010

Map: Lewis C. Gray History of Agriculture in the Southern United States to 1860 (Washington, D.C., 1933). 652-55

Interactive map Slave population in the United States (click on the years button to see what it was by year

http://oieahc.wm.edu/wmq/Oct09/deyle.html

1790: 697,624

1820: 1,538,022

1840: 2,487,355

1860 3,953,760

M. A. Shaban on the Zanj revolt. The quoted part is page 102 but he starts on page 101

http://books.google.com/books?id=Wkqlp-lHllcC&pg=PA101

"If more proof is needed that it was not a slave revolt, it is to be found in the fact that it had a highly organized army and navy which vigorously resisted the whole weight of the central government for almost fifteen years. Moreover, it must have had huge resources that allowed it to build no less than six impregnable towns in which there were arsenals for the manufacture of weapons and battleships. These towns also had in their mammoth markets prodigious wealth which was more than the salt marshes could conceivably produce. Even all the booty from Basra and the whole region could not account for such enormous wealth. Significantly the revolt had the backing of a certain group of merchants who preserved with their support until the very end. Tabari makes it very clear that the strength of the rebels was dependent on the support of these merchants. "

FRERE'S CRUSADE:

http://books.google.com/books?id=YAIZAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA207&dq=#v=onep...

"But the British Government can easily make the Bombay authorities execute the laws against the slave-traders, whose headquarters are in their dominions. If the Banians, who are subjects of the queen, find that they will be punished for felony for direct or indirect participation in this traffic, they will use their capital in some less dangerous business. As the Arabs have not the wealth to carry on the slave trade to any extent, the British cruisers will be able to put a stop to it, even if they are not aided by the native rulers whose subjects are concerned in it. The Shah of Persia, however, has already expressed his intention to cooperate with Great Britain in this matter, and has issued two firmans peremptorily forbidding the importation of negroes by sea into his dominions"

From Livingston

http://books.google.com/books?id=m-8MAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA556&dq=#v=onep...

"It is well known that the slave trade in this country is carried on almost entirely with his money and that of other Banian British subjects. The Banians advance the goods required, and the Arabs proceed inland as their agents, perform the trading, or rather murdering, and when slaves and ivory are brought to the coast the Arabs sell the slaves. The Banians pocket the price, and adroitly let the odium rest on their agents. As a rule no traveling Arab has money sufficient to undertake an inland journey. Those who have become rich imitate the Banians, and send their indigent countrymen and slaves to trade for them. The Banians could scarcely carry on their system of trade were they not in possession of the custom-house, and had power to seize all the goods that pass through it to pay themselves for debts.....

From "The Wesleyan-Methodist magazine"

http://books.google.com/books?id=7w4EAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA4-PA516&dq=#v=onep...

"We commend to the consideration of our merchants the strange facts brought to light in these investigations. A single Indian house, we are told, employs a capital of half a million sterling in advances to slave-owners and slave-dealers, mainly in Zanzibar alone! No less than £140,000 is lent to European and American firms, Indians being the creditors, and the great commercial peoples of Europe and the new world the debtors. Nothing gives us so startling an idea of the gigantic proportions and the strange ramifications of this horrible trade as these monetary transactions. Well may Sir Bartle Frere say, " I know nothing like it in the history of commerce;" and well may the British Indians take the greatest pains to conceal their transactions in " black pepper and " soiled ivory."....

"It seems to be forgotten that the East African slave-trade in its present shape is the growth of the last half century. A few slaves probably always went ; but in their present numbers, and with the present horrors of original capture and conveyance, the trade has become possible only since piracy was suppressed;

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (markellion)

  • This weekend I'll post some new material and about how massive numbers of Africans were brought to the United States after the slave trade was illegal

  • Many Iraqis are already dark skinned but there is also the issue of where the victims of the expansion of the slave trade went to.

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BlackThoughtChannel exactly when was slavery abolished? There's too many date(s)

  • They were slaves. This is well recorded in Persian history as well as Arab and Islamic history. Genetically these people are not J1 or J2 carriers so they aren't indigenous to Asia. Doesn't necessary validate the claim of them being former slave but ask any Arab what does "abeed" mean...

  • Non were slaves because they were there before Any Liars or so called his story ans were even on the planet!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @markellion Have you seen the documentaries "The Journey of Man," & "The Human Family Tree?" What i learned was that when Africans migrated out of Africa thousands of years ago,...they settled along the coasts of Iran and India. As well islands in the Indian ocean. As Africans were migrating their genetic make up changed. So i don't think some of the people you speak of were necessarily slaves,..They are indigenous peoples who migrated on their own thousands of years ago.

  • looking forward to the new video, i totally didnt know they continued to bring slaves after slavery was abolished. even though nothing should suprise me about the white man!

  • That's absolutely true, my Great Great Great Grandmother was one of those slaves who was bought here after the offiical abolishment of slavery.

  • *****

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more