Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - Did We Land On The Moon (Fox TV) part-(3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
382,646
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 7, 2008

Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - Did We Land On The Moon (Fox TV) [43.49] part 3 uploaded by Rave for Jayita Dasgupta

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,724)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Watch the mythbusters on this. On some of the identical pictures. Astronauts followed other astronauts tracks.

  • @katewil24 I think its even worse to be lied to by ignorant conspiracy gluttons. As bad as the gov is, its still more believable than some random dufus whining on a dork webpage

  • @yayoineko Who cares? How about millions of people who don't think it's okay to be lied to by their government? Tsk tsk. Wake up.

  • Thank you Mythbusters for busting these stupid ass hoax claims.

  • grany because they were transmitting signal in the 60's from the fucking moon!

  • @Wheedlinglemur the problem is... astronomers are bussy why much very important pieces of work... they have no time to pay atention to conspiracy theorists...

  • @weristsimon Buzz was orbiting the moon at that point in the mission as they said "now the Moon's own moon"

  • @Wheedlinglemur Actually they arent saying that Nasa didnt go to the moon.. they are saying that they didnt send a man to the moon.. so even if you could see leftovers from the mission it still doesnt prove anything

  • @Wheedlinglemur Not even hubble space telescope is able to picture the moon with such a high resolution. There are many different calculations about it on the internet, and they're all about 170 metres resolution. It could be possible to picture the lander's shadow when the sun is very low, but this appears to be very tricky, as you need to have a >170m shadow and there is a lot of shadow on the moon.

    You could also send an orbiter to have a look at it, but why should NASA do so?

  • @Wheedlinglemur Look at the LRO pictures of the landing sites. (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter)

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more