@katewil24 I think its even worse to be lied to by ignorant conspiracy gluttons. As bad as the gov is, its still more believable than some random dufus whining on a dork webpage
@Wheedlinglemur the problem is... astronomers are bussy why much very important pieces of work... they have no time to pay atention to conspiracy theorists...
@Wheedlinglemur Actually they arent saying that Nasa didnt go to the moon.. they are saying that they didnt send a man to the moon.. so even if you could see leftovers from the mission it still doesnt prove anything
@Wheedlinglemur Not even hubble space telescope is able to picture the moon with such a high resolution. There are many different calculations about it on the internet, and they're all about 170 metres resolution. It could be possible to picture the lander's shadow when the sun is very low, but this appears to be very tricky, as you need to have a >170m shadow and there is a lot of shadow on the moon.
You could also send an orbiter to have a look at it, but why should NASA do so?
Watch the mythbusters on this. On some of the identical pictures. Astronauts followed other astronauts tracks.
sharksldw 2 days ago
@katewil24 I think its even worse to be lied to by ignorant conspiracy gluttons. As bad as the gov is, its still more believable than some random dufus whining on a dork webpage
SpreadingtheMuse 4 days ago
@yayoineko Who cares? How about millions of people who don't think it's okay to be lied to by their government? Tsk tsk. Wake up.
katewil24 6 days ago
Thank you Mythbusters for busting these stupid ass hoax claims.
JeremeK 1 week ago in playlist More videos from ravishankar09 2
grany because they were transmitting signal in the 60's from the fucking moon!
45678ret 1 week ago 2
@Wheedlinglemur the problem is... astronomers are bussy why much very important pieces of work... they have no time to pay atention to conspiracy theorists...
kajakpaddler92 1 week ago
@weristsimon Buzz was orbiting the moon at that point in the mission as they said "now the Moon's own moon"
kajakpaddler92 1 week ago
@Wheedlinglemur Actually they arent saying that Nasa didnt go to the moon.. they are saying that they didnt send a man to the moon.. so even if you could see leftovers from the mission it still doesnt prove anything
killswitch3ngag3 1 week ago
@Wheedlinglemur Not even hubble space telescope is able to picture the moon with such a high resolution. There are many different calculations about it on the internet, and they're all about 170 metres resolution. It could be possible to picture the lander's shadow when the sun is very low, but this appears to be very tricky, as you need to have a >170m shadow and there is a lot of shadow on the moon.
You could also send an orbiter to have a look at it, but why should NASA do so?
weristsimon 1 week ago
@Wheedlinglemur Look at the LRO pictures of the landing sites. (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter)
hceely 2 weeks ago