Peter Schiff at Harvard University 11/07/09 Part 10 of 10

http://www.zazzle.com/mattgeb84
http://www.gebhardtweddingvideo.com Peter Schiff senate Harvard tom woods crashproof wallstreet unspun austrian economics ron paul end the fed bernanke campaign for liberty c4l yal young americans obama stimulus health care reform deficit bush libertarian democrat pelosi

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Peter
• Schiff
• senate
• Harvard
• tom
• woods
• crashproof
• wallstreet
• unspun
• austrian
• economics
• ron
• paul
• end
• the
• fed
• bernanke
• campaign
• for
• liberty
• c4l
• yal
• young
• americans
• obama
• stimulus
• health
• care
• reform
• deficit
• bush
• libertarian
• democrat
• pelosi

[PoliticsAddict]

at 9:13 peter looked to be walking a bit peculiar. one might assume peter was the drunk one, not wall street.

[mattgeb84]

nope he did not look drunk at all, have no idea what video your watching

[cmstyz]

Thanks for posting these videos!

[slickbtk]

lol oh your right, I read it too fast and thought you were one of these ignorant anti capitalists. sorry, my fault. Glad to see I was wrong about your education and intelligence.

[Kant419]

@PoliticsAddict I think you're too busy sucking the dicks of today's politicians and your eyes are smothered in semen. Peter Schiff is arguably one of if not the best economists of our time.

[LilRedRasta]

Always remember you're unique, just like everybody else

[defgill]

@coturnix19 When I said unique living human person, I meant that it is not just another part of the woman like a kidney or something since it has dna from both the mother and father. The question is when the fetus is a considered a human being with rights.

[defgill]

totally agree!!! except the right for termination of pregnancy. Without a doubt a unique living human person is inside the womb. With that, it logically proceeds that it therefore must have rights, including the right to be alive!

[MEv1551]

Thanks for posting this!

[stealthswimmer]

@liReesh

completely different scenario. In your scenario there is a written document and both parties agree. There is no written document for babies and also the baby is not around when the woman decides to get pregnant so there is no contract violation (unless she makes a contract with someone else saying that she will carry her pregnancy to term, in which case I'm sure such a document would have some sort of clause in it saying what the punishment would be if the agreement is violated)

[liReesh]

@stealthswimmer so if I ask a family to rent my house and they sign a 9 month lease and they live up to every obligation and have done nothing wrong except live there as i asked them to, you still have the right to break the lease and evict them??? in fact no, you sure as hell do not. these babes in the womb are as innocent as anything and it is totally incorrect by any measure for some wishy washy idiot to think even for a minute they have a right to kill that baby because it's inconvenient.

[liReesh]

@pro404 so if i place a 2 month old infant on a table and she doesn't survive, she wasn't really alive in the first place? that doesn't even approach a logical argument.

since, you only care about the economic realm, imagine the productivity lost by the 60 million taxpayers who have been killed via abortion in the last few decades.  i'm supporting schiff too, but he is wrong if he holds your viewpoint. luckily, the kinds of judges he would confirm would see it my way, so we both win.

[darkfenix3000]

LMAO @4:17 You need to kick shit out your political opponents! Trust me, you'll enjoy it LOL

[dontdispie]

This was fantastic thank you for posting.